Gas Giant Ring Collapse Theory for Rocky Planet Formation

In summary, the conversation discusses the possibility of a hypothesis or theory proposing that rocky planets were formed from gas giants whose ring system collapsed and combined with the core of the gas giant. The speaker expresses skepticism towards this theory, stating that gas giants have rocky cores and that the amount of material in their rings is not enough to significantly change their composition. They also question the distinction between "rocky" and "gas" planets in this theory.
  • #1
Glenn
Has there ever been a hypothesis or theory propsed (current or obsolete) proposing that the rocky planets formed from gas giants whose ring system collapsed and combined with the core of the gas giant forming the bulk of a new rocky planet?

Just wondering if this has ever been proposed or whether it is even allowed by the laws of physics.

Thanks,
-Glenn
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
  • #2
Re-Planet Formation

I've not seen any theory like the one you are looking for, and to be honest, I would not expect to see one either.

I assume that such a theory would have to assume that a gas giant is all gas, after all if it is to "change into a rocky planet", then it would not have had a solid core to begin with. As I understand it, gas giants have rocky cores which form when they are born from the gas/dust halo around a protostar. They are only gas giants because they are large enough, and hence exert sufficient gravity to hold onto their volatiles, helium, and hydrogen. So, I don't see the clear distinction between "rocky" or "gas" planets which your theory would require.
Furthermore, I don't thing the amount of material in the rings around the planets of our solar system is very much. For example, if the rings of Saturn were somehow compacted you would only have the equivalent of a small moon or asteroid. If this was incorporated into the core of Saturn it would still be a gas giant. After all, the act of adding to the rocky core does not remove any of the gas that gives the planet its designation.
 

Related to Gas Giant Ring Collapse Theory for Rocky Planet Formation

What is the Gas Giant Ring Collapse Theory?

The Gas Giant Ring Collapse Theory is a hypothesis that suggests rocky planets, like Earth, may have formed from the debris left behind after a gas giant planet collapsed onto its own core during the early stages of our solar system's formation.

How does this theory explain the formation of rocky planets?

According to the Gas Giant Ring Collapse Theory, when a gas giant planet reaches a critical mass, its own gravity causes it to collapse onto its core. This collapse releases a large amount of energy, which heats up the surrounding gas and dust in the protoplanetary disk. This heated material then cools and condenses, forming rocky planetesimals that eventually collide and grow into rocky planets.

What evidence supports the Gas Giant Ring Collapse Theory?

One of the key pieces of evidence for this theory is the fact that gas giants like Jupiter and Saturn have a much higher abundance of heavier elements, like oxygen and carbon, in their atmospheres compared to the Sun. This suggests that these planets may have formed through the accretion of rocky material. Additionally, simulations of planet formation have shown that the Gas Giant Ring Collapse Theory can reproduce the observed characteristics of our solar system's rocky planets.

Are there any limitations to this theory?

One limitation of the Gas Giant Ring Collapse Theory is that it cannot fully explain the formation of all rocky planets in our universe. This is because not all exoplanetary systems have gas giants like Jupiter and Saturn, so this mechanism may not be applicable in those cases. Additionally, further research and observations are needed to better understand the formation of gas giants and their potential role in rocky planet formation.

How does this theory compare to other theories of rocky planet formation?

The Gas Giant Ring Collapse Theory is just one of several hypotheses proposed to explain the formation of rocky planets. Other theories include the core accretion model and the disk instability model. Each of these theories has its own strengths and limitations, and further research is needed to understand the full picture of how rocky planets form in our universe.

Similar threads

  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
31
Views
5K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
28
Views
8K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
Replies
21
Views
1K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
5
Views
2K
Back
Top