Gas Giant Ring Collapse Theory for Rocky Planet Formation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the hypothesis that rocky planets could form from the collapsed ring systems of gas giants. No existing theories support this idea, as gas giants are believed to have rocky cores formed from the gas/dust halo around protostars. The distinction between rocky and gas planets is unclear, as adding material to a gas giant's core does not change its gaseous nature. Additionally, the material in the rings of gas giants, like Saturn, is insufficient to significantly alter their composition. Overall, the proposed theory does not align with current understanding of planetary formation.
Glenn
Has there ever been a hypothesis or theory propsed (current or obsolete) proposing that the rocky planets formed from gas giants whose ring system collapsed and combined with the core of the gas giant forming the bulk of a new rocky planet?

Just wondering if this has ever been proposed or whether it is even allowed by the laws of physics.

Thanks,
-Glenn
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Re-Planet Formation

I've not seen any theory like the one you are looking for, and to be honest, I would not expect to see one either.

I assume that such a theory would have to assume that a gas giant is all gas, after all if it is to "change into a rocky planet", then it would not have had a solid core to begin with. As I understand it, gas giants have rocky cores which form when they are born from the gas/dust halo around a protostar. They are only gas giants because they are large enough, and hence exert sufficient gravity to hold onto their volatiles, helium, and hydrogen. So, I don't see the clear distinction between "rocky" or "gas" planets which your theory would require.
Furthermore, I don't thing the amount of material in the rings around the planets of our solar system is very much. For example, if the rings of Saturn were somehow compacted you would only have the equivalent of a small moon or asteroid. If this was incorporated into the core of Saturn it would still be a gas giant. After all, the act of adding to the rocky core does not remove any of the gas that gives the planet its designation.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top