Gauss Law and a hollow spherical shell

stunner5000pt
Messages
1,443
Reaction score
4
A hollow spherical shell carries a charge density
\rho = \frac{k}{r^2}

in the region a<= r <= b. As in the figure
Find the elctric field in these three regions
i) r <a
ii) a<r<b
iii) r>b

SOlution:
for r<a it simple.. no exclosed charge for any gaussian sphere within that region so E = 0

for a<r<b
the thing which stumps is the charge density... isn't charge density given in coulombs per cubic metre usually??

what I am concerned about in the enclosed charge in teh gaussian sphere of radius a<r<b... would i integrate rho from r' = a to r' = r??

rho dot dr would give the total charge enclosed, no??

doing that gives
q_{enc} = k\left(\frac{1}{a} - \frac{1}{r}\right)

E (4 \pi r^2) = \frac{k}{epsilon_{0}} \left(\frac{1}{a} - \frac{1}{r}\right)<br /> <br /> for the third part that is r&gt;b would i do something similar but integrate from r&#039; =a to r&#039;=b?? <br /> <br /> Please help!<br /> <br /> Help is always greatly appreciated!
 

Attachments

  • noise.JPG
    noise.JPG
    11.2 KB · Views: 461
Physics news on Phys.org
stunner5000pt said:
for a<r<b
the thing which stumps is the charge density... isn't charge density given in coulombs per cubic metre usually??
Absolutely. Which means that k has what units?

what I am concerned about in the enclosed charge in teh gaussian sphere of radius a<r<b... would i integrate rho from r' = a to r' = r??
Yes.

rho dot dr would give the total charge enclosed, no??
No! An element of charge would be rho dV, not rho dr. rho is the charge density per unit volume.
 
Doc Al said:
Absolutely. Which means that k has what units?

No! An element of charge would be rho dV, not rho dr. rho is the charge density per unit volume.

so K has units of C/m

so i should be integrating rho dV but still r'=a to r'=r

thanks for the help
 
stunner5000pt said:
so K has units of C/m

so i should be integrating rho dV but still r'=a to r'=r
Yes and yes.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top