Gauss Law - Conducting cylindrical shell

AI Thread Summary
In a thick conducting cylindrical shell with inner radius R1 and outer radius R2, the electric field is zero for points inside the shell (r < R1) and can be calculated for points outside (r > R2) using Gauss's Law. Between the inner and outer surfaces (R1 < r < R2), the electric field remains zero due to electrostatic equilibrium, despite the net charge Q on the conductor. The excess charge resides solely on the outer surface of the shell, with no charge on the inner surface, as confirmed by Gauss's Law. This means that for any Gaussian surface within the conducting material, the enclosed charge is zero. Thus, the conducting shell maintains its properties regardless of the net charge present.
MichaelT
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
1. A thick conducting cylindrical shell has an inner radius Rsub1 and outer radius Rsub2. It has a net excess charge = Q, and it is L long. Find electric field at certain points given.

Ok, when r is less than Rsub 1, the electric field is zero. And when r is greater than Rsub2, it is easy to calculate using Gauss's Law. Now, when r is between Rsub1 and Rsub2...what is the excess charge inside the Gaussian cylinder? I know that any net charge in a conductor must be on one of the surfaces. But on which one, and how much on each?

This might be a silly guess, but maybe Q/2 ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What's the field within the material of the conducting shell? (Between R_1 and R_2.)
 
The electric field inside the material of a conducting shell is zero when the conductor is in electrostatic equilibrium. Does that still hold even though this conductor has a net charge of Q?
 
Absolutely.
 
Ok, that's cool. A little strange to me though. Intuitively it does make sense, but when you use Gauss's Law, wouldn't there be some excess charge inside a Gaussian cylinder with r between R_1 and R_2? Or would the excess charge Q remain on the outer surface of the conductor?
 
The excess charge can only exist on the surface of the conducting cylinder. Since there's no charge contained in the cavity (at r < R_1), there's no charge on the inner surface. (Convince yourself of this using Gauss's law.) Thus all excess charge is on the outer surface.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top