Gauss' Law for a Nonuniform Field

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around applying Gauss' Law to a closed rectangular surface in a nonuniform electric field defined by E = 3*x xhat N/C. The participant questions the relationship between enclosed charge and net electric flux, noting that if no charge is enclosed, the net flux should theoretically be zero. However, they observe that the electric field strength increases from the x = a face to the x = c face, suggesting a nonzero net flux. This leads to the conclusion that there must be some charge present within the closed surface to account for the observed flux. The conversation highlights the complexities of applying Gauss' Law in nonuniform fields.
Redfire66
Messages
36
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A closed rectangular surface with dimensions a = b and c where the faces perpendicular to the field are a*b. The left edge of the closed surface is located at position x = a, for c > a.The electric field throughout the region is nonuniform and given by E = 3*x xhat N/C,

Homework Equations


Flux = Integral of E(dot)dA = qenclosed/Epsilon0

The Attempt at a Solution


I'm just wondering about how this works, if there is no enclosed charge, then there shouldn't be a net flux.

I'm pretty sure the flux at one end is greater as it reaches the x = c face than at x = a, is it possible to have a nonzero net flux?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Conclusion: there is charge in the box.
 
  • Like
Likes gneill
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top