Gauss' law in line integral, Q=##ϵ_0 ∮E.n dl=-ϵ_0 ∮∂ϕ/∂n dl##

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around applying Gauss' law in a 2D context to calculate total charge on a conductor using line integrals of the electric field. The original poster seeks clarification on how to relate the line integral expression to charge calculation, particularly in the context of a 2D problem. They have computed the potential distribution using the finite element method and now aim to derive the total charge from the electric field. The conversation highlights the use of Green's Theorem to connect the divergence of the electric field to line integrals along the boundary. The poster proposes an equation for charge calculation, seeking validation on its correctness.
mdn
Messages
49
Reaction score
0
I know the Gauss law for surface integral to calculate total charge by integrating the normal components of electric field around whole surface . but in above expression charge is calculated using line integration of normal components of electric field along line. i don't understand this relation. any help please.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Is this a 2D problem? Because integrating over a closed curve (ie the "surface" of an area) is the 2D equivalent of integrating over the surface of a volume. By Green's Theorem, <br /> \begin{split}<br /> \int_{\Omega} \nabla \cdot \mathbf{E}\,dA &amp;= \oint_{\partial\Omega} (-E_y, E_x, 0)\cdot \mathbf{t}\,dl \\<br /> &amp;= \oint_{\partial \Omega} (\mathbf{k} \times \mathbf{E}) \cdot \mathbf{t}\,dl \\<br /> &amp;= \oint_{\partial \Omega} \mathbf{E} \cdot (\mathbf{t} \times \mathbf{k})\,dl \\<br /> &amp;= \oint_{\partial \Omega} \mathbf{E} \cdot \mathbf{n}\,dl<br /> \end{split} since \mathbf{k} = \mathbf{n} \times \mathbf{t} where \mathbf{t} is the unit tangent of the curve traversed anticlockwise and \mathbf{n} is the outward unit normal.
 
  • Like
Likes mdn and topsquark
pasmith said:
Is this a 2D problem? Because integrating over a closed curve (ie the "surface" of an area) is the 2D equivalent of integrating over the surface of a volume. By Green's Theorem, <br /> \begin{split}<br /> \int_{\Omega} \nabla \cdot \mathbf{E}\,dA &amp;= \oint_{\partial\Omega} (-E_y, E_x, 0)\cdot \mathbf{t}\,dl \\<br /> &amp;= \oint_{\partial \Omega} (\mathbf{k} \times \mathbf{E}) \cdot \mathbf{t}\,dl \\<br /> &amp;= \oint_{\partial \Omega} \mathbf{E} \cdot (\mathbf{t} \times \mathbf{k})\,dl \\<br /> &amp;= \oint_{\partial \Omega} \mathbf{E} \cdot \mathbf{n}\,dl<br /> \end{split} since \mathbf{k} = \mathbf{n} \times \mathbf{t} where \mathbf{t} is the unit tangent of the curve traversed anticlockwise and \mathbf{n} is the outward unit norm
yes, this is the 2D problem. i am trying to calculate the total charge on conductor, shown by bold lines in 2D
1664674830832.png

domain. i have calculated potential distribution at each point using Laplace equation in finite element method, now i want to calculate total charge Q on this conductor, from this charge i want to calculate the capacitance. i want to use gauss divergence theorem to calculate charge ##E\bar =-\nabla\phi##, where ##\phi =potential##. here is my real problem. how to calculate total charge on conductor in above case and which normal components of electric field (in terms of scalar potential ##\nabla\phi##) should i integrate to get total charge?

from my side i have written equation like this..
##Q=\oint (E. n) dl##
Q=##\nabla\phi .n##
=##\oint(\partial\phi/\partial x +\partial \phi/\partial y)## dl
=##\oint {\partial \phi/ \partial x} dl +\oint {\partial \phi/ \partial y} dl##
=##\oint {\partial \phi/ \partial x} dy +\oint {\partial \phi/ \partial y} dx##
is this correct?
 

Attachments

  • 1664674694036.png
    1664674694036.png
    15.3 KB · Views: 127
Last edited:
Hi all I have some confusion about piezoelectrical sensors combination. If i have three acoustic piezoelectrical sensors (with same receive sensitivity in dB ref V/1uPa) placed at specific distance, these sensors receive acoustic signal from a sound source placed at far field distance (Plane Wave) and from broadside. I receive output of these sensors through individual preamplifiers, add them through hardware like summer circuit adder or in software after digitization and in this way got an...
I have recently moved into a new (rather ancient) house and had a few trips of my Residual Current breaker. I dug out my old Socket tester which tell me the three pins are correct. But then the Red warning light tells me my socket(s) fail the loop test. I never had this before but my last house had an overhead supply with no Earth from the company. The tester said "get this checked" and the man said the (high but not ridiculous) earth resistance was acceptable. I stuck a new copper earth...
I am not an electrical engineering student, but a lowly apprentice electrician. I learn both on the job and also take classes for my apprenticeship. I recently wired my first transformer and I understand that the neutral and ground are bonded together in the transformer or in the service. What I don't understand is, if the neutral is a current carrying conductor, which is then bonded to the ground conductor, why does current only flow back to its source and not on the ground path...

Similar threads

Back
Top