Gauss's Law application in Electrostatics

AI Thread Summary
Coulomb's law states that all charges, both internal and external to a Gaussian surface, contribute to the electric field. The discussion highlights confusion regarding whether the electric flux calculated using only internal charges would be greater than, equal to, or less than that calculated with the total field. It is clarified that when considering both internal and external charges, the flux remains equal due to Gauss's law, which states that the flux is proportional to the total enclosed charge. Thus, the flux through the Gaussian surface is consistently equal regardless of the inclusion of external charges. The conclusion reinforces that the answer to the flux comparison is indeed "equal to."
vcsharp2003
Messages
913
Reaction score
179
Homework Statement
Consider the Gaussian surface that surrounds part of charge distribution shown in diagram below.

(a) Which of the charges contribute to the electric field at point P?

(b) Would the value obtained for the flux through the surface, calculated using only the field due to ##q_1## and ##q_2##, be greater than, equal to, or less than that obtained using the total field?

MY PROBLEM IS WITH PART (B)
Relevant Equations
##F = \dfrac {Kq_1q_2} {r^2}##, which is the Coulomb's law
##\phi = \dfrac{\sum {q_i}} {{\epsilon}_0}##, which is Gauss's law
(a) Due to Coulomb's law all charges whether internal or external to Gaussian surface will contribute to the electric field. This is also mentioned as it's correct answer.

(b) The answer is "equal to", which makes no sense to me. It could be greater than, equal to, or less than that obtained using the total field since it will depend on the magnitudes of these individual charges.
16272437420066624548394785749685.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
vcsharp2003 said:
Homework Statement:: Consider the Gaussian surface that surrounds part of charge distribution shown in diagram below.

(a) Which of the charges contribute to the electric field at point P?

(b) Would the value obtained for the flux through the surface, calculated using only the field due to ##q_1## and ##q_2##, be greater than, equal to, or less than that obtained using the total field?

MY PROBLEM IS WITH PART (B)
Relevant Equations:: ##F = \dfrac {Kq_1q_2} {r^2}##, which is the Coulomb's law
##\phi = \dfrac{\sum {q_i}} {{\epsilon}_0}##, which is Gauss's law

(a) Due to Coulomb's law all charges whether internal or external to Gaussian surface will contribute to the electric field. This is also mentioned as it's correct answer.

(b) The answer is "equal to", which makes no sense to me. It could be greater than, equal to, or less than that obtained using the total field since it will depend on the magnitudes of these individual charges.View attachment 286573
I get it now. If we considered the following two cases: (1) only internal charges and (2) internal plus external charges, then the flux through the Gaussian surface would be ## \dfrac {q_1 + q_2} {{\epsilon}_0} ## in both cases according to Gauss's law.
Thus the answer to part (b) of my question is "equal to".
 
  • Like
Likes SammyS, Delta2 and Charles Link
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top