Gauss's Law on a Charged Sphere

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a homework problem involving Gauss's Law applied to a spherically symmetrical charge distribution. The user successfully calculated the electric field intensity for different regions (inside and outside the sphere) and determined the total charge using Gauss's Law. However, they struggled with calculating the potential difference between specified points and needed guidance on integrating the electric field correctly. Another participant clarified that the potential should be integrated from r to infinity, and emphasized the importance of matching constants to ensure continuity in potential. Ultimately, the user resolved their confusion with the help provided.
LeePhilip01
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hi I'm sorry if this is posted in the wrong section or it's laid out wrong but I have a question that I need a bit of help with.

Homework Statement


I'm given: A spherically symmetrical charge distribution is contained within a sphere of radius a with no charge outside. At a distance r (r \leq a) from the centre of the sphere the potential may be written as:

V = -Ar^{3} + B


Then I'm asked to calculate a bunch of things which hopefully I've got right.

(a) Calculate the electric field intensity for r < a.

(b) What is the electric field intensity for r = a.

(c) Using Gauss's law calculate the total charge in the sphere.

(d) What is the electric field for r > a?

(e) What is the potential for r > a if V_{\infty} = 0?

(f) Show that the difference in potential between r = a/2 and r = 2a is given by (19/8)Aa^{3}.

It's the last one I'm stuck on.

Homework Equations


Gauss's Law.

E = -\nabla V


The Attempt at a Solution



Ok. So for (a) I differentiated and got E = 3Ar^{2}

(b) I just subbed r=a and got E = 3Aa^{2}

(c) I got that E for r=a with Gauss's Law: E = \frac{Q}{4\pi\epsilon_{0}a^{2}}. Then equated that with answer from (b) to get Q = 12\pi\epsilon_{0}Aa^{4}

(d) I used Gauss's Law again to obtain: E = \frac{Q}{4\pi\epsilon_{0}r^{2}}.

Then I subbed in Q from part (c) to get: E = 3A\frac{a^{4}}{r^{2}}.

(e) I integrated -E with boundaries r and 0 and got: V = 3A\frac{a^{4}}{r}.

(f) Now I subbed r=a/2 into the equation for V given in the question. And r=2a into the equation I just got in part (e). But cannot seem to get (19/8)Aa^{3} at all.


Thanks for any help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For e, you need to integrate between r and infinity as the potential is zero at infinity.
For f, you need to match B so as V=-Ar3+B be the same at r=a as the outer potential.

ehild
 
Last edited:
Got it all sorted now! Thanks!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top