Gauss's Law on a Charged Sphere

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a homework problem involving Gauss's Law applied to a spherically symmetrical charge distribution. The user successfully calculated the electric field intensity for different regions (inside and outside the sphere) and determined the total charge using Gauss's Law. However, they struggled with calculating the potential difference between specified points and needed guidance on integrating the electric field correctly. Another participant clarified that the potential should be integrated from r to infinity, and emphasized the importance of matching constants to ensure continuity in potential. Ultimately, the user resolved their confusion with the help provided.
LeePhilip01
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hi I'm sorry if this is posted in the wrong section or it's laid out wrong but I have a question that I need a bit of help with.

Homework Statement


I'm given: A spherically symmetrical charge distribution is contained within a sphere of radius a with no charge outside. At a distance r (r \leq a) from the centre of the sphere the potential may be written as:

V = -Ar^{3} + B


Then I'm asked to calculate a bunch of things which hopefully I've got right.

(a) Calculate the electric field intensity for r < a.

(b) What is the electric field intensity for r = a.

(c) Using Gauss's law calculate the total charge in the sphere.

(d) What is the electric field for r > a?

(e) What is the potential for r > a if V_{\infty} = 0?

(f) Show that the difference in potential between r = a/2 and r = 2a is given by (19/8)Aa^{3}.

It's the last one I'm stuck on.

Homework Equations


Gauss's Law.

E = -\nabla V


The Attempt at a Solution



Ok. So for (a) I differentiated and got E = 3Ar^{2}

(b) I just subbed r=a and got E = 3Aa^{2}

(c) I got that E for r=a with Gauss's Law: E = \frac{Q}{4\pi\epsilon_{0}a^{2}}. Then equated that with answer from (b) to get Q = 12\pi\epsilon_{0}Aa^{4}

(d) I used Gauss's Law again to obtain: E = \frac{Q}{4\pi\epsilon_{0}r^{2}}.

Then I subbed in Q from part (c) to get: E = 3A\frac{a^{4}}{r^{2}}.

(e) I integrated -E with boundaries r and 0 and got: V = 3A\frac{a^{4}}{r}.

(f) Now I subbed r=a/2 into the equation for V given in the question. And r=2a into the equation I just got in part (e). But cannot seem to get (19/8)Aa^{3} at all.


Thanks for any help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For e, you need to integrate between r and infinity as the potential is zero at infinity.
For f, you need to match B so as V=-Ar3+B be the same at r=a as the outer potential.

ehild
 
Last edited:
Got it all sorted now! Thanks!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top