General approach to find principal axes of rotation?

AI Thread Summary
To find the principal axes of rotation for an equilateral triangle through one vertex, start by recognizing that the median is a principal axis due to the triangle's symmetry. The challenge lies in identifying two additional axes that are mutually perpendicular to the centroidal axis. A proposed method involves considering the triangle's rotation about one of its sides, although this approach raises questions about its validity since a full 360-degree rotation does not constitute symmetry. A more reliable method involves calculating the inertia tensor and finding its eigenvectors, which indicate the principal axes and their corresponding moments of inertia. Utilizing theorems related to the center of mass and planes of symmetry can further aid in confirming the principal axes.
Mind----Blown
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Suppose i have an equilateral triangle and i want to find the principal axes of rotation passing through one of the vertex. How can i do that? I am thinking along the following lines but I'm not too sure:

1)Since the equilateral triangle has symmetry about a median, that definitely is one principal axis.

2)Now, i want 2 axes such that those 2 axes and the centroidal axis which i found above are mutually perpendicular. The problem now, however, is that i don't have any "symmetry" to rely on. Sure i COULD think along this line now :

"if i rotate the triangle 360 degrees about one of the sides, i would return to the original configuration, so let me choose that as one of the axis, which leaves me with only one choice for the third axis and voila!"

But i am not too sure of my approach in 2nd point since it just doesn't seem right; rotating an object 360 degrees to get the original configuration isn't really a symmetry!

1) So, is there some fool-proof way i can use (and be 100% certain of being correct) to determine principal axes of rotation?

2) Maybe mathematical?

3) Also, how reliable is this symmetry approach i follow?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There is a general method to find the principal axes:

(1) First, calculate the inertia tensor. This mathworld site gives a definition of how to calculate the tensor, but it is basically:

upload_2017-4-27_19-52-38.png


(2) Find the eigenvectors of the inertia tensor. The eigenvectors point in the direction of the principal axes, and the eigenvalues are the moment of inertia about these three axes.
 
First specify how mass is distributed in the triangleAnyway the following two theorems will be useful for you.

1) Let ##S## be a center of mass of a rigid body and ##J_S## be the operator of inertia about ##S##. If ##\ell,\quad S\in \ell## is the principle axis for ##J_S## then for each point ##A\in \ell## the exis ##\ell## is the principle axis for ##J_A##.

2) Assume that ##\Pi## is a plane of material symmetry of the rigid body and let ##A\in \Pi##. Define an exis ##\ell## to be perpendicular to ##\Pi## and ##A\in\ell##. Then ##\ell## is a principle axis for ##J_A##.
 
Last edited:
thanks!
 
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'
Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
I know that mass does not affect the acceleration in a simple pendulum undergoing SHM, but how does the mass on the spring that makes up the elastic pendulum affect its acceleration? Certainly, there must be a change due to the displacement from equilibrium caused by each differing mass? I am talking about finding the acceleration at a specific time on each trial with different masses and comparing them. How would they compare and why?

Similar threads

Back
Top