General approach to find principal axes of rotation?

AI Thread Summary
To find the principal axes of rotation for an equilateral triangle through one vertex, start by recognizing that the median is a principal axis due to the triangle's symmetry. The challenge lies in identifying two additional axes that are mutually perpendicular to the centroidal axis. A proposed method involves considering the triangle's rotation about one of its sides, although this approach raises questions about its validity since a full 360-degree rotation does not constitute symmetry. A more reliable method involves calculating the inertia tensor and finding its eigenvectors, which indicate the principal axes and their corresponding moments of inertia. Utilizing theorems related to the center of mass and planes of symmetry can further aid in confirming the principal axes.
Mind----Blown
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Suppose i have an equilateral triangle and i want to find the principal axes of rotation passing through one of the vertex. How can i do that? I am thinking along the following lines but I'm not too sure:

1)Since the equilateral triangle has symmetry about a median, that definitely is one principal axis.

2)Now, i want 2 axes such that those 2 axes and the centroidal axis which i found above are mutually perpendicular. The problem now, however, is that i don't have any "symmetry" to rely on. Sure i COULD think along this line now :

"if i rotate the triangle 360 degrees about one of the sides, i would return to the original configuration, so let me choose that as one of the axis, which leaves me with only one choice for the third axis and voila!"

But i am not too sure of my approach in 2nd point since it just doesn't seem right; rotating an object 360 degrees to get the original configuration isn't really a symmetry!

1) So, is there some fool-proof way i can use (and be 100% certain of being correct) to determine principal axes of rotation?

2) Maybe mathematical?

3) Also, how reliable is this symmetry approach i follow?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There is a general method to find the principal axes:

(1) First, calculate the inertia tensor. This mathworld site gives a definition of how to calculate the tensor, but it is basically:

upload_2017-4-27_19-52-38.png


(2) Find the eigenvectors of the inertia tensor. The eigenvectors point in the direction of the principal axes, and the eigenvalues are the moment of inertia about these three axes.
 
First specify how mass is distributed in the triangleAnyway the following two theorems will be useful for you.

1) Let ##S## be a center of mass of a rigid body and ##J_S## be the operator of inertia about ##S##. If ##\ell,\quad S\in \ell## is the principle axis for ##J_S## then for each point ##A\in \ell## the exis ##\ell## is the principle axis for ##J_A##.

2) Assume that ##\Pi## is a plane of material symmetry of the rigid body and let ##A\in \Pi##. Define an exis ##\ell## to be perpendicular to ##\Pi## and ##A\in\ell##. Then ##\ell## is a principle axis for ##J_A##.
 
Last edited:
thanks!
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Let there be a person in a not yet optimally designed sled at h meters in height. Let this sled free fall but user can steer by tilting their body weight in the sled or by optimal sled shape design point it in some horizontal direction where it is wanted to go - in any horizontal direction but once picked fixed. How to calculate horizontal distance d achievable as function of height h. Thus what is f(h) = d. Put another way, imagine a helicopter rises to a height h, but then shuts off all...

Similar threads

Back
Top