General Harmonic Oscillator

helpppmeee
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Edit: Problem solved please disregard this post

Homework Statement


A particle in the harmonic oscillator potential has the initial wave function \Psi(x, 0) = ∑(from n = 0 to infinity) Cnψn(x) where the ψ(x) are the (normalized) harmonic oscillator eigenfunctions and the coefficients are given by the expression Cn = 1/(√(2^(n=1))). What is the probability that a measurement of the oscillator's energy at an arbitrary time t>0 will yield a result greater than 2(hbar)ω.

Homework Equations


En = (n + 1/2)(hbar)ω

The Attempt at a Solution


I believe I can attempt the answer. The P(E>2(hbar)ω) is when En = 2(hbar)ω so ∴, n > 2 is when En = 2(hbar)ω. So, from 2 to infinite integers, we have the potential energies according to the equation \Psi(x, 0) = ∑(from n = 0 to infinity) Cnψn(x). So therefore, I believe that the integral of (\Psi(x, 0))^2 will give me my probability of finding the energy. So therefore, P(E>2(hbar)ω) = 1 - P(E≤2(hbar)ω) where P(E≤2(hbar)ω) = C1ψ1 + C0ψ0. I just can't seem to figure out what ψ is.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Really? nobody can help?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top