General help understanding emf and p.d

  • Thread starter Thread starter Gregg
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Emf General
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding the relationship between electromotive force (emf), potential difference (p.d.), and internal resistance in a battery. It emphasizes using a graph of p.d. (V) against current (I) to determine the battery's emf and internal resistance by analyzing the gradient and y-intercept. The gradient is calculated as approximately 1.67 Ω, representing the internal resistance, while the y-intercept indicates the emf. The equation E = V + Ir is rearranged to illustrate the linear relationship, with V as a function of I. A related question arises about the differing proportionality of V and I in this context compared to an ohmic conductor.
Gregg
Messages
452
Reaction score
0
Circuit1.jpg


Graph to show the variation of the p.d. V across the battery with current I as R is varied.


Table1.jpg


i) Draw line of best fit.

ii) Use it to determine the emf of the battery;

and the internal resistance r of the battery.


The gradient \approx \frac{\Delta V}{\Delta I} = 1.67 \Omega

Just don't know what to do really. Need an example and explanation of the concept.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Let the internal resistance of the battery be r.
The same current,I, passes through both r and R right?

So by Kirchoff's 2nd law

the emf of the battery=sum of the pd's around the loop
If V is the pd across the load then

E=V+Ir.

Since they plotted V against I, rearrange the equation it in the form a straight line y=mx+c

you calculated the gradient correctly to give a resistance. So rearrange the equation and you will see what that gradient represents and what the intercept represents as well.
 
V = f(I)

V = -Ir + E


y-intercept is emf, gradient is -r. Thanks.
 
Hi I had a similar question, which I posted at the the thread 'internal resistance graph'. It was basically why are V are I inversely proportional in this graph, but proportional in the graph of an ohmic conductor?
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top