General question abotu the raidus on an electric field due to line of charge.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on evaluating the electric field due to a uniform line of charge along the x-axis. It clarifies that the radius used in the integrand for calculating the electric field at a point not on the line should be expressed as r = (-b - x), ensuring the radius remains positive. The electric field around an infinite line charge is radial and symmetrical, meaning the evaluation point's position along the line does not affect the radial distance. The key takeaway is that the distance from any point on the line charge to the evaluation point must be correctly defined to maintain a positive radius. This understanding is crucial for accurate calculations in electrostatics.
1stepatatime
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
This is due to a line of charge that rests on an axis and evaluating the electric field at a point that is also on the same axis. Will the radius, no matter what always be positive?

So if one end of a uniform line of charge is placed at the origin that extends in the negative x-axis and there is some point at -b (that is not on the line of charge) that I am to evaluate the electric field, would my radius be r=(x-b) in the integrand?

edit: sorry for misspelling the title.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Could you give a little bit more description? The electric field around an infinite line charge is radial and has symmetry, it doesn't matter where along the line you choose to evaluate the field, all that matters is the radial distance from the wire.

Sorry not bio-savart law lol, my mistake.
 
Kalvarin said:
Could you give a little bit more description? The electric field around an infinite line charge is radial and has symmetry, it doesn't matter where along the line you choose to evaluate the field, all that matters is the radial distance from the wire.

Sorry not bio-savart law lol, my mistake.

Sorry about that, to clarify:

Given my example, if a rod with uniform charge density had one end placed at the origin of the x-axis, and extended some distance of x=-a in the negative x direction and there was some point P at x= -b which is further down the negative x-axis than x=-a. Would the radius function in the integrand of the electric field at point P be r= (-b-x)? Since the x values along the rod are negative this would make r positive in value. Is this what my goal for r should be?
 
Last edited:
Yes i believe that is right. The vector from a point on the line charge to the point in space is
-b-x like you said.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top