General question about solutions to Laplace's equation

AI Thread Summary
Any solution to Laplace's equation, given specific boundary conditions, can indeed be expressed as a linear superposition of separable solutions. This is supported by the theorem stating that functions can be represented as linear combinations of orthogonal functions, such as Legendre polynomials or trigonometric functions. Each set of boundary conditions defines a unique solution, reinforcing the concept of orthogonality in the derived separable solutions. However, there are geometries where Laplace's equation may not be separable, although specific examples are not readily available. Overall, the discussion affirms the validity of using separable solutions for Laplace's equation under appropriate conditions.
AxiomOfChoice
Messages
531
Reaction score
1
Is it true that any solution to Laplace's equation, subject to any set of boundary conditions, can be written as a linear superposition of separable solutions?

I'm sure there are some vagaries in what I've written above. Feel free to point them out and rectify them.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I believe there's some theorem in math which says that any function can be written as a linear combination of orthogonal functions. And I'm pretty sure that any set of boundary conditions on solutions to Laplace's Equation uniquely defines one solution. If you've derived a family of separable solutions to Laplace's Equation, then it must consist of functions with some sort of orthogonality relation (e.g. Legendre Polynomials, spherical harmonics, trigonometric functions), and so you can write any function you like as a linear combination of them. So I don't see why what you're saying shouldn't be true.
 
No, I believe that there exist "geometries" (shapes of the boundary) for which Laplace's equation is NOT separable. Unfortunately, I can't think of any off hand.
 
Back
Top