Engineering General second order circuit problem - Find V(t) for t > 0

[VinnyCee]

Homework Statement

http://img396.imageshack.us/img396/2781/chapter8problem55oy6.jpg

For the circuit above, find v(t) for t\,>\,0.

Assume that v\left(0^+\right)\,=\,4\,V and i\left(0^+\right)\,=\,2\,A.

Homework Equations

i_c\,=\,C\,\frac{d\,v_c}{dt}

The Attempt at a Solution

I made a new diagram:

http://img507.imageshack.us/img507/4142/chapter8problem55part2zm4.jpg

i_1\,=\,C_1\,\frac{d\,V_{C_1}}{dt}

i_2\,=\,\frac{V_1\,-\,V_2}{2\,\Omega}

i\,=\,C_2\,\frac{d\,V_{C_2}}{dt}

KCL @ V_1) i_1\,+\,\frac{i}{4}\,-\,i_2\,=\,0C_1\,\frac{d\,V_{C_1}}{dt}\,+\,\frac{C_2}{4}\,\frac{d\,V_{C_2}}{dt}\,-\,\frac{V_1\,-\,V_2}{2\,\Omega}\,=\,00.2\,\frac{d\,V_{C_1}}{dt}\,+\,0.25\frac{d\,V_{C_2}}{dt}\,-\,V_1\,+\,V_2\,=\,0
KCL @ V_2) i\,+\,i_2\,=\,0C_2\,\frac{d\,V_{C_2}}{dt}\,+\,\frac{V_1\,-\,V_2}{2\,\Omega}\,=\,0\frac{d\,V_{C_2}}{dt}\,+\,V_1\,-\,V_2\,=\,0V_2\,=\,\frac{d\,V_{C_2}}{dt}\,+\,V_1Now substituting the KCL @ V_2 equation into the other equation:0.2\,\frac{d\,V_{C_1}}{dt}\,+\,1.25\,\frac{d\,V_{C_2}}{dt}\,=\,0Here I am stuck. I don't know how to proceed, any hints? I know that I am supposed to get a second order differential equation for the circuit, but where from?

 

[Ne0]

Have you done circuits in the s-domain? That would make this problem much easier to solve for. It would become a simple two-mesh problem in which you could use Cramer's rule to solve for with the constraint equation for the dependant source. And I am pretty sure it is not going to be a second order differential equation since there is only one reactive element per mesh.

 

[VinnyCee]

No, I have not done s-domain yet.

 

[berkeman]

I think you need to use your substitution to eliminate one of the unknowns, instead of getting an equation that still has both in it. And then you'll need to make an assumption about the form of the solution, differentiate it and plug it back into solve, and then use the initial conditions for the full form of the final solution. By looking at the circuit, I'd guess the solution is a damped exponential, but it might have other terms...

 

[SGT]

Homework Statement

http://img396.imageshack.us/img396/2781/chapter8problem55oy6.jpg

For the circuit above, find v(t) for t\,>\,0.

Assume that v\left(0^+\right)\,=\,4\,V and i\left(0^+\right)\,=\,2\,A.

Homework Equations

i_c\,=\,C\,\frac{d\,v_c}{dt}

The Attempt at a Solution

I made a new diagram:

http://img507.imageshack.us/img507/4142/chapter8problem55part2zm4.jpg

i_1\,=\,C_1\,\frac{d\,V_{C_1}}{dt}

i_2\,=\,\frac{V_1\,-\,V_2}{2\,\Omega}

i\,=\,C_2\,\frac{d\,V_{C_2}}{dt}

KCL @ V_1) i_1\,+\,\frac{i}{4}\,-\,i_2\,=\,0


C_1\,\frac{d\,V_{C_1}}{dt}\,+\,\frac{C_2}{4}\,\frac{d\,V_{C_2}}{dt}\,-\,\frac{V_1\,-\,V_2}{2\,\Omega}\,=\,0


0.2\,\frac{d\,V_{C_1}}{dt}\,+\,0.25\frac{d\,V_{C_2}}{dt}\,-\,V_1\,+\,V_2\,=\,0



KCL @ V_2) i\,+\,i_2\,=\,0


C_2\,\frac{d\,V_{C_2}}{dt}\,+\,\frac{V_1\,-\,V_2}{2\,\Omega}\,=\,0


\frac{d\,V_{C_2}}{dt}\,+\,V_1\,-\,V_2\,=\,0


V_2\,=\,\frac{d\,V_{C_2}}{dt}\,+\,V_1


Now substituting the KCL @ V_2 equation into the other equation:


0.2\,\frac{d\,V_{C_1}}{dt}\,+\,1.25\,\frac{d\,V_{C_2}}{dt}\,=\,0


Here I am stuck. I don't know how to proceed, any hints? I know that I am supposed to get a second order differential equation for the circuit, but where from?

With the reference senses you used, you have

i_1\,=\,-C_1\,\frac{d\,V_{C_1}}{dt}

i\,=\,-C_2\,\frac{d\,V_{C_2}}{dt}

and i_2 = -i

You can use this with

KCL @ V_2) i\,+\,i_2\,=\,0

to eliminate i_1 and i_2

 

[antoker]

Have you done circuits in the s-domain? That would make this problem much easier to solve for. It would become a simple two-mesh problem in which you could use Cramer's rule to solve for with the constraint equation for the dependant source. And I am pretty sure it is not going to be a second order differential equation since there is only one reactive element per mesh.

I'll second to that, s-domain (laplace) will make your life much more easier ;)
Neo, are you a mind-reader or something, was about to say about Cramer's rule as well

 

[VinnyCee]

Okay, I'll try s-domain.

http://img400.imageshack.us/img400/9269/problem55part3cs4.jpg

i_c\,=\,\frac{V_1\,-\,0}{\frac{10}{s}}\,=\,\frac{V_1\,s}{10}

i\,=\,\frac{V_1\,-\,0}{\frac{2}{s}\,+2}\,=\,\frac{V_1\,s}{2\,+\,2s}

KCL @ V_1:

-i_c\,-\,\frac{i}{4}\,-\,i\,=\,0

-i_c\,-\,\frac{5}{4}\,i\,=\,0

-\frac{V_1\,s}{10}\,-\,\frac{5}{4}\,\frac{V_1\,s}{2\,+\,2s}\,=\,0

How do I proceed now?

 

[SGT]

Okay, I'll try s-domain.

http://img400.imageshack.us/img400/9269/problem55part3cs4.jpg

i_c\,=\,\frac{V_1\,-\,0}{\frac{10}{s}}\,=\,\frac{V_1\,s}{10}

i\,=\,\frac{V_1\,-\,0}{\frac{2}{s}\,+2}\,=\,\frac{V_1\,s}{2\,+\,2s}

KCL @ V_1:

-i_c\,-\,\frac{i}{4}\,-\,i\,=\,0

-i_c\,-\,\frac{5}{4}\,i\,=\,0

-\frac{V_1\,s}{10}\,-\,\frac{5}{4}\,\frac{V_1\,s}{2\,+\,2s}\,=\,0

How do I proceed now?

Since you are looking for a zero input response, you must include the initial conditions in your equation.
Or you can use the hint I gave you in my previous post and solve the problem in the time domain.

 

[VinnyCee]

Using your hint in a previous post, I obtained a new KCL @ V_1 equation:

i_1\,-\,\frac{5}{4}\,i\,=\,0

-C_1\,\frac{dV_{c1}}{dt}\,-\,\frac{5}{4}\,C_2\,\frac{dV_{c2}}{dt}\,=\,0

How do I get initial conditions and how to finally solve?

 

[SGT]

Using your hint in a previous post, I obtained a new KCL @ V_1 equation:

i_1\,-\,\frac{5}{4}\,i\,=\,0

-C_1\,\frac{dV_{c1}}{dt}\,-\,\frac{5}{4}\,C_2\,\frac{dV_{c2}}{dt}\,=\,0

How do I get initial conditions and how to finally solve?

You must have only one variable.
Remember that
V_{c1} = V_{c2} - R i = V_{c2} + RC_2\frac{dV_{c2}}{dt}
so,

\frac{dV_{c1}}{dt} = \frac{dV_{c2}}{dt} + RC_2\frac{d^2V_{c1}}{dt^2}
For the initial conditions you must have
V_{c2}(0^+) and \frac{dV_{c2}}{dt}(0^+)

V_{c2} = V_{c1} + R i
So, V_{c2}(0^+) = V_{c1}(0^+) + R i(0^+) = 4 + 2x2 = 8V
\frac{dV_{c2}}{dt} = -\frac{i}{C_2}
So, \frac{dV_{c2}}{dt}(0^+) = -\frac{i}(0^+){C_2} = \frac{2}{0.5} = 4V/s