General second order circuit problem - Find V(t) for t > 0

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around solving a second-order circuit problem to find the voltage V(t) for t > 0, given initial conditions. Participants explore various approaches, including time-domain analysis and s-domain techniques, while addressing the complexities of the circuit's behavior.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses uncertainty about how to derive a second-order differential equation from the circuit analysis and seeks hints on how to proceed.
  • Another participant suggests using s-domain analysis, claiming it would simplify the problem to a two-mesh scenario, although they note that it may not lead to a second-order differential equation due to the number of reactive elements.
  • Some participants propose eliminating unknowns through substitution and making assumptions about the form of the solution, suggesting it could be a damped exponential.
  • A later reply emphasizes the importance of including initial conditions in the equations when using s-domain analysis.
  • Participants discuss the need to derive new equations based on KCL (Kirchhoff's Current Law) and how to incorporate initial conditions into their calculations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

There is no consensus on the best approach to solve the problem. Some participants advocate for s-domain methods while others prefer time-domain analysis. The discussion reflects differing opinions on the nature of the equations that need to be derived and the assumptions that should be made.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the initial conditions and how they affect the solution. There are unresolved mathematical steps related to the derivation of equations and the application of KCL, as well as dependencies on the definitions of circuit elements.

VinnyCee
Messages
486
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



http://img396.imageshack.us/img396/2781/chapter8problem55oy6.jpg

For the circuit above, find v(t) for t\,>\,0.

Assume that v\left(0^+\right)\,=\,4\,V and i\left(0^+\right)\,=\,2\,A.

Homework Equations



i_c\,=\,C\,\frac{d\,v_c}{dt}

The Attempt at a Solution



I made a new diagram:

http://img507.imageshack.us/img507/4142/chapter8problem55part2zm4.jpg

i_1\,=\,C_1\,\frac{d\,V_{C_1}}{dt}

i_2\,=\,\frac{V_1\,-\,V_2}{2\,\Omega}

i\,=\,C_2\,\frac{d\,V_{C_2}}{dt}

KCL @ V_1) i_1\,+\,\frac{i}{4}\,-\,i_2\,=\,0C_1\,\frac{d\,V_{C_1}}{dt}\,+\,\frac{C_2}{4}\,\frac{d\,V_{C_2}}{dt}\,-\,\frac{V_1\,-\,V_2}{2\,\Omega}\,=\,00.2\,\frac{d\,V_{C_1}}{dt}\,+\,0.25\frac{d\,V_{C_2}}{dt}\,-\,V_1\,+\,V_2\,=\,0
KCL @ V_2) i\,+\,i_2\,=\,0C_2\,\frac{d\,V_{C_2}}{dt}\,+\,\frac{V_1\,-\,V_2}{2\,\Omega}\,=\,0\frac{d\,V_{C_2}}{dt}\,+\,V_1\,-\,V_2\,=\,0V_2\,=\,\frac{d\,V_{C_2}}{dt}\,+\,V_1Now substituting the KCL @ V_2 equation into the other equation:0.2\,\frac{d\,V_{C_1}}{dt}\,+\,1.25\,\frac{d\,V_{C_2}}{dt}\,=\,0Here I am stuck. I don't know how to proceed, any hints? I know that I am supposed to get a second order differential equation for the circuit, but where from?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Have you done circuits in the s-domain? That would make this problem much easier to solve for. It would become a simple two-mesh problem in which you could use Cramer's rule to solve for with the constraint equation for the dependent source. And I am pretty sure it is not going to be a second order differential equation since there is only one reactive element per mesh.
 
No, I have not done s-domain yet.
 
I think you need to use your substitution to eliminate one of the unknowns, instead of getting an equation that still has both in it. And then you'll need to make an assumption about the form of the solution, differentiate it and plug it back into solve, and then use the initial conditions for the full form of the final solution. By looking at the circuit, I'd guess the solution is a damped exponential, but it might have other terms...
 
VinnyCee said:

Homework Statement



http://img396.imageshack.us/img396/2781/chapter8problem55oy6.jpg

For the circuit above, find v(t) for t\,>\,0.

Assume that v\left(0^+\right)\,=\,4\,V and i\left(0^+\right)\,=\,2\,A.



Homework Equations



i_c\,=\,C\,\frac{d\,v_c}{dt}



The Attempt at a Solution



I made a new diagram:

http://img507.imageshack.us/img507/4142/chapter8problem55part2zm4.jpg

i_1\,=\,C_1\,\frac{d\,V_{C_1}}{dt}

i_2\,=\,\frac{V_1\,-\,V_2}{2\,\Omega}

i\,=\,C_2\,\frac{d\,V_{C_2}}{dt}

KCL @ V_1) i_1\,+\,\frac{i}{4}\,-\,i_2\,=\,0


C_1\,\frac{d\,V_{C_1}}{dt}\,+\,\frac{C_2}{4}\,\frac{d\,V_{C_2}}{dt}\,-\,\frac{V_1\,-\,V_2}{2\,\Omega}\,=\,0


0.2\,\frac{d\,V_{C_1}}{dt}\,+\,0.25\frac{d\,V_{C_2}}{dt}\,-\,V_1\,+\,V_2\,=\,0



KCL @ V_2) i\,+\,i_2\,=\,0


C_2\,\frac{d\,V_{C_2}}{dt}\,+\,\frac{V_1\,-\,V_2}{2\,\Omega}\,=\,0


\frac{d\,V_{C_2}}{dt}\,+\,V_1\,-\,V_2\,=\,0


V_2\,=\,\frac{d\,V_{C_2}}{dt}\,+\,V_1


Now substituting the KCL @ V_2 equation into the other equation:


0.2\,\frac{d\,V_{C_1}}{dt}\,+\,1.25\,\frac{d\,V_{C_2}}{dt}\,=\,0


Here I am stuck. I don't know how to proceed, any hints? I know that I am supposed to get a second order differential equation for the circuit, but where from?

With the reference senses you used, you have

i_1\,=\,-C_1\,\frac{d\,V_{C_1}}{dt}

i\,=\,-C_2\,\frac{d\,V_{C_2}}{dt}

and i_2 = -i

You can use this with

KCL @ V_2) i\,+\,i_2\,=\,0

to eliminate i_1 and i_2
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Ne0 said:
Have you done circuits in the s-domain? That would make this problem much easier to solve for. It would become a simple two-mesh problem in which you could use Cramer's rule to solve for with the constraint equation for the dependent source. And I am pretty sure it is not going to be a second order differential equation since there is only one reactive element per mesh.

I'll second to that, s-domain (laplace) will make your life much more easier ;)
Neo, are you a mind-reader or something, was about to say about Cramer's rule as well :biggrin:
 
Okay, I'll try s-domain.

http://img400.imageshack.us/img400/9269/problem55part3cs4.jpg

i_c\,=\,\frac{V_1\,-\,0}{\frac{10}{s}}\,=\,\frac{V_1\,s}{10}

i\,=\,\frac{V_1\,-\,0}{\frac{2}{s}\,+2}\,=\,\frac{V_1\,s}{2\,+\,2s}

KCL @ V_1:

-i_c\,-\,\frac{i}{4}\,-\,i\,=\,0

-i_c\,-\,\frac{5}{4}\,i\,=\,0

-\frac{V_1\,s}{10}\,-\,\frac{5}{4}\,\frac{V_1\,s}{2\,+\,2s}\,=\,0

How do I proceed now?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
VinnyCee said:
Okay, I'll try s-domain.

http://img400.imageshack.us/img400/9269/problem55part3cs4.jpg

i_c\,=\,\frac{V_1\,-\,0}{\frac{10}{s}}\,=\,\frac{V_1\,s}{10}

i\,=\,\frac{V_1\,-\,0}{\frac{2}{s}\,+2}\,=\,\frac{V_1\,s}{2\,+\,2s}

KCL @ V_1:

-i_c\,-\,\frac{i}{4}\,-\,i\,=\,0

-i_c\,-\,\frac{5}{4}\,i\,=\,0

-\frac{V_1\,s}{10}\,-\,\frac{5}{4}\,\frac{V_1\,s}{2\,+\,2s}\,=\,0

How do I proceed now?

Since you are looking for a zero input response, you must include the initial conditions in your equation.
Or you can use the hint I gave you in my previous post and solve the problem in the time domain.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Using your hint in a previous post, I obtained a new KCL @ V_1 equation:

i_1\,-\,\frac{5}{4}\,i\,=\,0

-C_1\,\frac{dV_{c1}}{dt}\,-\,\frac{5}{4}\,C_2\,\frac{dV_{c2}}{dt}\,=\,0

How do I get initial conditions and how to finally solve?
 
  • #10
VinnyCee said:
Using your hint in a previous post, I obtained a new KCL @ V_1 equation:

i_1\,-\,\frac{5}{4}\,i\,=\,0

-C_1\,\frac{dV_{c1}}{dt}\,-\,\frac{5}{4}\,C_2\,\frac{dV_{c2}}{dt}\,=\,0

How do I get initial conditions and how to finally solve?

You must have only one variable.
Remember that
V_{c1} = V_{c2} - R i = V_{c2} + RC_2\frac{dV_{c2}}{dt}
so,

\frac{dV_{c1}}{dt} = \frac{dV_{c2}}{dt} + RC_2\frac{d^2V_{c1}}{dt^2}
For the initial conditions you must have
V_{c2}(0^+) and \frac{dV_{c2}}{dt}(0^+)

V_{c2} = V_{c1} + R i
So, V_{c2}(0^+) = V_{c1}(0^+) + R i(0^+) = 4 + 2x2 = 8V
\frac{dV_{c2}}{dt} = -\frac{i}{C_2}
So, \frac{dV_{c2}}{dt}(0^+) = -\frac{i}(0^+){C_2} = \frac{2}{0.5} = 4V/s
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K