General Simplification of (1+x)/(1-x)

  • Thread starter Thread starter remorris
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    General
remorris
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I know that (1-x)/(1+x) is equivalent to (2/(x+1)) - 1 via 'hand waving' in my textbook but i cannot figure out the steps to arrive at this result. Suggestions??
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You can write 1-x as -x-1+2=-(x+1)+2 and simplify.
That is a usual trick for fractions like yours.
 
Neat Trick. Thanks!
 
remorris said:
I know that (1-x)/(1+x) is equivalent to (2/(x+1)) - 1 via 'hand waving' in my textbook but i cannot figure out the steps to arrive at this result. Suggestions??

mfb said:
You can write 1-x as -x-1+2=-(x+1)+2 and simplify.
That is a usual trick for fractions like yours.

An alternate approach is to divide - x + 1 by x + 1 using polynomial long division. If you don't know this technique, you can search Wikipedia using the search string "polynomial long division". Doing this, you get -1 + 2/(x + 1).
 
remorris said:
I know that (1-x)/(1+x) is equivalent to (2/(x+1)) - 1 via 'hand waving' in my textbook but i cannot figure out the steps to arrive at this result. Suggestions??

Yet another equivalent way to see this is to replace 1 by (1+x)/(1+x) and you now have a common denominator of 1 + x. Gathering terms in the numerator yields 1 - x.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top