I General solution of harmonic oscillations

AI Thread Summary
The discussion explains the general solution for a harmonic oscillator described by the equation of motion m d²x = F, where F = -mω²x. The solution can be expressed as a combination of two linearly independent functions, specifically x(t) = A exp(iωt) + B exp(-iωt). This leads to the equivalent representation using sine and cosine functions, x(t) = C cos(ωt) + D sin(ωt), due to their linear independence. Initial conditions, such as position and velocity at t=0, can be applied to determine a unique solution. The exchange between exponential and trigonometric forms is clarified through Euler's formula, reinforcing the concept of linear combinations in solving differential equations.
skyesthelimit
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
For a harmonic oscillator with a restoring force with F= -mω2x, I get that the solution for the x-component happens at x=exp(±iωt). But why is it that you can generalise the solution to x= Ccosωt+Dsin(ωt)? Where does the sine term come from because when I use Euler's formula, the only real part seems to be the cosine term?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, you need two linearly independent solutions of the equation of motion
$$m \ddot{x}=F \; \Rightarrow \; \ddot{x}=-\omega^2 x$$
(BTW you forgot the ##x## in your force formula).

You can use any two linearly independent solutions. Obviously your two functions will do. The general solution of the equation of motion is given by all possible linear combinations, i.e.,
$$x(t)=A \exp(\mathrm{i} \omega t) + B \exp(-\mathrm{i} \omega t).$$
Obviously also ##\cos(\omega t)## and ##\sin(\omega t)## solve the equations, and since they are linearly independent the complete solution is also given as superpositions of them, i.e., also
$$x(t)=A' \cos(\omega t) + B' \sin(\omega t)$$
give the complete set of solutions.

You can make the solution unique by assuming the appropriate initial conditions, which is of course the natural thing for a typical mechanics problem: You need to give the position and velocity of the particle at some initial time, say ##t=0##, i.e., you give the values ##x(0)=x_0## and ##\dot{x}(0)=v_0##. Now you can use both superpositions to evaluate the now unique solution ##x(t)## for these initial conditions. You'll see that of course you get the same result.

Another way to see this is to express the one set of linearly independent functions in terms of the other. For that just remember how cos and sin are expressed in terms of exponential functions or use Euler's formula to derive them.
 
oh right! thanks I just edited the equation! this was super helpful - i didn't quite think about it in terms of linearly independent solutions!
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top