General topology of a two terminal electrical device

AI Thread Summary
In a two-terminal electrical device, the primary topologies are indeed series and parallel connections. However, the discussion raises the possibility of more complex configurations depending on how terminals are defined. If terminals are considered as nodes with single links, only parallel connections are feasible. Conversely, if terminals are defined differently, more intricate arrangements can be created without reducing to simple series or parallel forms. The conversation highlights the importance of clearly defining what constitutes a terminal in circuit topology discussions.
tarjeibo
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
There are several possible topologies for an electrical circuit.

However, if we limit our circuit to be a two terminal device, how will this limit the options for the different topologies?

I am a beginner in this field, but as far as I can tell by drawing the circuits, the only possible topologies in a two terminal device are the well-known series and parallel connections. Is this true, and if yes, why is that? If not, what other types of topologies are possible to construct in a two-terminal device?


Thanks,
Tarjei
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Not sure I've understood the question, but what about making all six possible connections between four nodes, then attaching nodes to two them?
 
I will try to rephrase my question.

Given a two terminal device. Between the two terminals, we may have as many resistors, capacitors and inductors as we want. My question is then:

Is the only possible topology between the two terminals series and parallel connection. Or is it possible to "create" other, more complex topologies as well, given that we only have two terminals?
 
tarjeibo said:
I will try to rephrase my question.

Given a two terminal device. Between the two terminals, we may have as many resistors, capacitors and inductors as we want. My question is then:

Is the only possible topology between the two terminals series and parallel connection. Or is it possible to "create" other, more complex topologies as well, given that we only have two terminals?
How are you defining 'terminal'? I think of a network as consisting of nodes and links. (Vertices and edges, in graph theory terminology.) Are you calling every node a terminal, or only those nodes that have a single link?
If every node is a terminal then you only have two nodes, and the only circuits possible are parallel.
If only nodes of degree one are terminals then you can use the construction I posted before, which cannot be reduced by successive grouping into parallel and series clusters.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top