Generic Intersection of non-planar Surfaces in R^4

In summary, the conversation is discussing how to show that two planar surfaces in R^4 intersect at points and how to justify the Poincare dual of the intersection form in cohomology being modular. There is confusion about this not applying to lines, which intersect at points when embedded in lower dimensions. The key concept for understanding this is transversality, which determines the dimension of the intersection. Zhentil is thanked for being helpful in this discussion.
  • #1
Bacle
662
1
Hi, everyone:

How do we show that 2 planar surfaces in R^4 intersect at points (possibly empty

sets of points, but not in lines, etc.).

I am curious to see how we justify the Poincare dual of the intersection form in

cohomology being modular, i.e., integer-valued.?

I am confused because the same does not seem to apply to, e.g., lines, which,

when embedded in R^2 or R^3 and R^4 , intersect (if at all) at points.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
It's transversality. If the intersection is transverse, they intersect in a submanifold with the appropriate dimension (dim A +dim B - dim M). Here the dimension is 0, so they generically intersect in isolated points, if at all.
 
  • #3
Just to say thanks, Zhentil; you have been very helpful.
 

1. What is the definition of "Generic Intersection of non-planar Surfaces in R^4"?

The generic intersection of non-planar surfaces in R^4 refers to the set of points where two or more non-planar surfaces intersect in a four-dimensional space.

2. What are some examples of non-planar surfaces in R^4?

Examples of non-planar surfaces in R^4 include a sphere, a torus, a paraboloid, and a hyperboloid.

3. How is the generic intersection of non-planar surfaces in R^4 different from planar intersections?

The generic intersection of non-planar surfaces in R^4 is different from planar intersections in that it occurs in a four-dimensional space, whereas planar intersections occur in a three-dimensional space. This means that the generic intersection of non-planar surfaces can have more complex and varied shapes.

4. What is the significance of studying the generic intersection of non-planar surfaces in R^4?

Studying the generic intersection of non-planar surfaces in R^4 is important in various fields such as differential geometry, topology, and computer graphics. It allows for a better understanding of the behavior of surfaces in higher dimensions and has practical applications in areas such as computer-aided design and 3D modeling.

5. Are there any real-world applications of the generic intersection of non-planar surfaces in R^4?

Yes, the generic intersection of non-planar surfaces in R^4 has numerous real-world applications. For example, it is used in computer graphics to render realistic and complex 3D objects, in engineering for designing curved surfaces, and in physics for studying the behavior of non-planar surfaces in four-dimensional space.

Similar threads

  • Differential Geometry
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
822
  • Differential Geometry
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
2
Replies
63
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
987
Back
Top