Geometric optics: Thin lense equation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a problem involving a thin lens equation to determine the positions for a lens that can create a well-focused image of a candle flame on a wall. The focal length of the lens is given as 32 cm, and the object distance is 2.0 m. A user attempts to derive the image distance and height but encounters errors in their calculations, specifically in the formulation of the equations. The correct image distances provided in the answer key are 160 cm and 40 cm, with corresponding image heights of 0.50 cm and 8.0 cm. Participants emphasize the importance of correctly deriving the equations to avoid dimensional inconsistencies and to accurately solve the problem.
Beth N
Messages
41
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement


A 2.0-cm-tall candle flame is 2.0 m from a wall. You happen to have a lens with a focal length of 32 cm. How many places can you put the lens to form a well-focused image of the candle flame on the wall? For each location, what are the height and orientation of the image?

Homework Equations


## \frac {1} {f} = \frac {1} {s'} + \frac {1} {s} ## Where s' is image distance, s is object distance, and f is focal length of the lens. The lens is converging because its focal length is positive.

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
I just have a hard time approach in the question. I came up with a quadratic formula but still got wrong answer. Apologize for not writing this in Latex I am in quite a rush.

s'+s=2
s's=2/f=2/0.32=6.25

The answer key provided is s′=160 cm, h′=0.50 cm; s′=40 cm, h′=8.0 cm

Thank you so much!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Beth N said:
s's=2/f
This equation is incorrect. Check your derivation of it. (Note that the left side of your equation has units of m2 while the right side is dimensionless since you have 2m divided by the focal length in meters.)
 
TSny said:
This equation is incorrect. Check your derivation of it. (Note that the left side of your equation has units of m2 while the right side is dimensionless since you have 2m divided by the focal length in meters.)

Is this the correct approach though? I'm not sure what other equation to use
 
Yes, your approach is correct. Can you write out the steps that led you to s's=2/f? Then we can identify the specific mistake that you must have made.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...

Similar threads

Back
Top