Geometric Significance of A=e(A.e)+e x (A x e)

neelakash
Messages
491
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



Let A be an arbitrary vector and e be a unit vector in some fixed direction.Show that
A=e(A.e)+e x (A x e)

What is the geometrical significance of each of the two terms?

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



I can show it easily.As the first term (a dot product) is the component in the e direction and the 2nd term(a cross product) is the component in the perpendicular direction.
What else geometrical significance they may be talking about?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
neelakash said:

Homework Statement



Let A be an arbitrary vector and e be a unit vector in some fixed direction.Show that
A=e(A.e)+e x (A x e)

What is the geometrical significance of each of the two terms?

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



I can show it easily.As the first term (a dot product) is the component in the e direction and the 2nd term(a cross product) is the component in the perpendicular direction.
What else geometrical significance they may be talking about?
I think that's all they were looking for.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top