Geosychoronous Satellites and their KE/Orbitals

Thread starter AryRezvani
Start date Nov 8, 2012
Tags

Satellites

AI Thread Summary

The discussion revolves around proving that the product of the kinetic energy and orbital radius of a geosynchronous satellite remains constant. The kinetic energy formula provided is KE = ½mGM/R, which relates the satellite's mass, gravitational constant, and orbital radius. Participants express confusion about how to approach the proof and the requirements for a geosynchronous orbit, which must be circular and synchronized with the Earth's rotation. Clarification on the relationship between kinetic energy and orbital radius is sought. Understanding these concepts is essential for solving the homework problem effectively.

Nov 8, 2012

AryRezvani

Homework Statement

Prove that the product of the kinetic energy and orbital radius of a geosynchronous satellite is constant.

Homework Equations

Not sure on the orbital radius part

KE=KE = ½mGM/R

The Attempt at a Solution

I'm lost on where to begin. How exactly would I 'prove' it?

Physics news on Phys.org

Nov 8, 2012

AryRezvani

Bump!

Nov 8, 2012

gneill

Mentor

What shape must an orbit have if it is geosynchronous?

Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'

In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...

View full post »

Thread 'Explain this asphalt sheen'

This problem is two parts. The first is to determine what effects are being provided by each of the elements - 1) the window panes; 2) the asphalt surface. My answer to that is The second part of the problem is exactly why you get this affect. And one more spoiler:

View full post »

Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'

Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

View full post »