Getting energy from earths rotation with a giant powerball nailed to the ground

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the concept of harnessing Earth's rotation by spinning a giant powerball nailed to the ground at latitude 45º to generate energy. Theoretical claims suggest it could reach 13,000 RPM, but concerns arise about the feasibility and potential catastrophic consequences of extracting Earth's angular momentum. Participants emphasize the necessity of adhering to established physics principles, particularly regarding gyroscopic motion. The viability of the idea is questioned, with some asserting that it lacks scientific grounding. Overall, the conversation highlights skepticism about the practicality and safety of such an energy generation method.
giordano bruno
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
if you spin a powerball in the shape of a cone it will reach 13000 rpm

the idea is to nail a giant powerball to the ground at latitude 45º so it describes a cone and steal little by little Earth's angular momentum to generate energy

do you think this is viable?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
i think it was tesla who research on this idea of getting energy from Earth's momentum
 
I'm not sure what a power ball is, but if it were possible to do this, we would reach a state where the Earth is no longer rotating. I'm pretty sure this would have a catastrophic effect on life on earth.
 
jpr0: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Powerball_(toy )

giordno brono: No. Read the Wik link.

edit: I just noticed that you don't accept Newtonian physics's explanation of gyroscopic motion. Discussion along these lines will go nowhere until you accept physics. There isn't anything we can do to help you with that.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top