Given a box contain 50m3 of gases, how fast should I pump gases into?

  • Thread starter Thread starter td21
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Box Gases Pump
AI Thread Summary
To completely replace the gases in a 50m³ box within one hour, a minimum pumping rate of 5/6 m³/min is calculated. However, there is uncertainty about whether this rate is sufficient, as residual gases may remain due to mixing dynamics. Some participants suggest that a higher rate might be necessary to ensure complete replacement, potentially doubling the rate to 10/6 m³/min. The discussion also highlights the complexities of gas behavior and mixing, questioning the assumptions made about gas expulsion and retention. Ultimately, the simplest solution is favored unless additional criteria are provided for a more precise answer.
td21
Gold Member
Messages
177
Reaction score
8

Homework Statement



Given a house(with ventilation system) contains 50m3 of gases, what is minimum rate should I pump gases into the box so that the box contains completely new gas from outside in an hour? (Challenge question)

Homework Equations



rate = volume/time

statistical mechanics
fluid dynamics

The Attempt at a Solution



50m3/60min = 5/6 m3/min?
I do not believe the question being that simple I think some old gases will remain inside. Also, should the the answer be 10/6 m3/min (the double)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yeah, could well be they try to trick you. Context decides here if it's really that simple or whether you should pump at infinite rate (and even then: some gas molecules might make it from the exhaust to the pump inlet ! -- this is not unrealistic: last week we had to evacuate our building because pentadiene was nicely sent outside by the exhaust system, but weather conditions made it return to the 'fesh air' inlet faster than anybody had ever foreseen!)

Taking the double isn't so smart: arbitrary. Either 5/6 or infinity (but then you get blown out too, probably, so maybe 5/6 is the better gamble) !

Not very physics, this exercise...
 
BvU said:
Yeah, could well be they try to trick you. Context decides here if it's really that simple or whether you should pump at infinite rate (and even then: some gas molecules might make it from the exhaust to the pump inlet ! -- this is not unrealistic: last week we had to evacuate our building because pentadiene was nicely sent outside by the exhaust system, but weather conditions made it return to the 'fesh air' inlet faster than anybody had ever foreseen!)

Taking the double isn't so smart: arbitrary. Either 5/6 or infinity (but then you get blown out too, probably, so maybe 5/6 is the better gamble) !

Not very physics, this exercise...

Thank you for the response. What if no gas molecules might make it from the exhaust to the pump inlet? This should be a pretty good assumption.The reason for me to consider double is that the gas pumped in will repel the gas originally inside out of the house through the ventilation, but on the other hand the gas pumped in may get repelled by other gases pumped in as well. Therefore, the probability of the new gas pumped into remain in house or be expelled from house is 1/2 (or not?) in the overall process. Therefore to fill the house with completely new gases, the rate should be double to do this in a certain amount of time (an hour). Is this a good "approximation"?
 
I agree with you. Whatever one pumps in gets mixed with what's already inside. Type of mixing is then also part of the discussion. But I still think the simplest answer is what's intended here, or else they would have given some criterion by which to choose: double, e times, or 99% refreshed, or whatever.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top