Given two charges where to put thrid charge for zero net force

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves two charges, q1 and q2, separated by a distance r, and seeks to determine the position of a third charge, q3, such that the net electrostatic force acting on it is zero. The discussion revolves around the application of Coulomb's Law and the conditions under which the forces balance.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore different cases based on the signs of q1 and q2, considering scenarios where they are both positive or negative. There is an attempt to derive equations for the position of q3 and questions arise regarding the behavior of these equations when q1 equals q2.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, analyzing the implications of their equations and discussing the validity of their approaches. Some guidance has been offered regarding the need to handle special cases differently, particularly when the charges are equal or have opposite signs.

Contextual Notes

There is an acknowledgment of potential complications when q1 equals q2, and participants are considering the implications of charge signs on the existence of solutions for the position of q3.

msbell1
Messages
25
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Two charges, q1 and q2, are separated by a distance r. Find the position at which a third charge, q3, can be placed so that the net electrostatic force on it is zero.


Homework Equations


Coulomb's Law:
F = (kq1q2)/r122 * (r12hat)


The Attempt at a Solution


I was trying to solve this for the general case, without making any assumptions about the relative signs of q1 and q2. However, this kind of turns into a mess (for me at least), so I changed my strategy. I now consider two cases. One is where q1q2>0 (they have the same sign. In this case, I know that q3 will have to be placed somewhere between q1 and q2. This gives me (after assigning q1 to the origin, and q2 to x=r, and placing q3 at position x),

(kq1q3)/x^2 = (kq2q3)/(r-x)^2

Solving this for x, I find:
x = [(q1 (+or-) sqrt(q1q2))/(q1-q2)]*r

This looks kind of ok, except, what happens when q1=q2? That doesn't make any sense. It would look better if it was (q1+q2) in the denominator. Then I thought maybe I messed up a sign in my original equation, so I tried

(kq1q3)/x^2 = -(kq2q3)/(r-x)^2

(I just put a minus sign in front of the term on the RHS.) This equation actually seems like it should be appropriate when q1q2<0 (the have opposite signs). Solving this gives:

x = [(q1 (+or-) sqrt(-q1q2))/(q1+q2)]r,

and this equation has perfect behavior for the case where it is valid, when q1q2<0.

Can anyone see what I did wrong in the first solution? I know if q1=q2 I should get x=r/2, not x=∞. Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
(kq1q3)/x^2 = (kq2q3)/(r-x)^2 [1]

Solving this for x, I find:
x = [(q1 (+or-) sqrt(q1q2))/(q1-q2)]*r [2]
I like this part.
In the middle step when you cross multiply and put in the form ax² + bx + c = 0
you can see that when q1 = q2, it is not a quadratic so for that case you would have to do something other than [2] to solve it. Check to see if it works out to x = r/2.
Maybe it works for q1 and q2 having opposite signs, too.
 
Thank you very much! I see that now! If I try this when q2 = -q1, I find
x = [(1 (+or-) sqrt(-1))/2]*r. Since this is imaginary, I guess this indicates that there is no solution between q1 and q2 when their signs are opposite, which is true.
 
Most welcome! Did you try q1 = 4, q2 = -1, q3 = 1? That should show if it works for q3 to the right of q2.
 

Similar threads

Replies
23
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K