Goodness of fit, Residual STD, chi square

Dan Zar
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Hello,

I am using CasaXPS to model synthetic peak models for X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy data. I am fitting.
The software has a lot of manuals online but they do not explain how they yield a Residual Standard Deviation, after each fit iteration. Most software use Chi-square or Reduced-Chi-squares, which I do not really understand either, but they are more widely used.
For example,
upload_2016-3-25_3-18-40.png

Whereas most softwares use Reduced Chi squares.
Lastly,Name Block Id Data Set Position FWHM Area St Dev Area %At Conc % St.Dev. Goodness of Fit
sp2 C1s 1-1 12 284.4560 1.1348 135.671 8.38179 54.79 286.976
sp3 C1s 1-1 285.0000 1.2000 89.8416 8.55699 36.28 286.976
sp2-Br C1s 1-1 285.6874 1.2000 14.7421 5.73433 5.95 286.976
C=P C1s 1-1 284.4843 0.9000 7.37342 2.8681 2.98 286.976 I get a report in which the "Goodness of Fit" equals 286.976, how do I transform this number into something statistically significant?
The examples they use on the manuals also happen to have high numbers for "Goodness of Fit"
Thanks a lot.
 

Attachments

  • upload_2016-3-25_3-16-1.png
    upload_2016-3-25_3-16-1.png
    49 KB · Views: 709
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you'll have to check the manual how that property is defined.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...

Similar threads

Back
Top