Graph Theory: Complement of a Graph

jack_bauer
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
I'm wondering, is it possible a graph G and its complement G' to be complete?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Start with the complete graph K_3, and find its complement. What do you notice? Think about the definition of the complement of a graph and think about what would happen in general.
 
A complete graph G on n vertices is a graph that has an edge between any two vertices, no matter which two you pick. The complement of G is a graph of n vertices and is constructed by drawing the n vertices on the paper and then filling in the edges that are not present in G. Which edges are missing in G if G is complete?
 
jack_bauer said:
I'm wondering, is it possible a graph G and its complement G' to be complete?

Sure, for K_0 and K_1.
 
i think you mean G union G' to be complete?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top