Graphing Parabolas that are not parallel to the y-axis

  • Thread starter Thread starter EuroNerd77
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Graphing Parallel
EuroNerd77
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I have gone over parabolas for a while in my Algebra II class and we are limited to just horizontal and vertical parabolas. I want to figure out how to graph a parabola that is titled at an angle. An equation that let's me graph a parabola whose axis of symmetry is let's say at 43° or 312.45° or whatever degree non parallel to an axis.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can always graph it as a vertical or horizontal parabola and then rotate it so the axis is what you want.
 
What would you do to the equation in order to rotate it? I need an equation to do this.
 
EuroNerd77 said:
What would you do to the equation in order to rotate it? I need an equation to do this.

Essentially you set a matrix with elements (cosx, sinx) for the first row and (-sinx, cosx) for the second row (x is the rotation angle). Each point (x,y) is transformed by mutiplying by the matrix.
 
Thread 'Determine whether ##125## is a unit in ##\mathbb{Z_471}##'
This is the question, I understand the concept, in ##\mathbb{Z_n}## an element is a is a unit if and only if gcd( a,n) =1. My understanding of backwards substitution, ... i have using Euclidean algorithm, ##471 = 3⋅121 + 108## ##121 = 1⋅108 + 13## ##108 =8⋅13+4## ##13=3⋅4+1## ##4=4⋅1+0## using back-substitution, ##1=13-3⋅4## ##=(121-1⋅108)-3(108-8⋅13)## ... ##= 121-(471-3⋅121)-3⋅471+9⋅121+24⋅121-24(471-3⋅121## ##=121-471+3⋅121-3⋅471+9⋅121+24⋅121-24⋅471+72⋅121##...
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...

Similar threads

Back
Top