Graphing Resistance vs. Bandwidth, why wouldn't go throught the origin?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between resistance and bandwidth, specifically why the plotted line of best fit does not intersect the origin. The user utilized Excel's LINEST function, which indicated a y-intercept around 288 Hz, raising questions about the simultaneous zero values of resistance and bandwidth. Two potential explanations were offered: data scatter affecting the best-fit line and the proximity of data points to the origin influencing the fit. Additionally, it was suggested that measuring instruments might contribute to bandwidth, meaning it could never be zero even if resistance is zero. Overall, the lack of intersection at the origin is attributed to data characteristics and measurement limitations.
crh
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
I am using Excel and plotting a line of best fit for Resistance vs. Bandwidth. I used the LINEST function to get my values, and it shows that it would cross the y-intercept at around 288 Hz. I am just wondering why when using resistance vs bandwidth it would never cross at the origin. That is what my manual says, and I guess that I am just confused as to why they could both never be zero at the same time. Am I over thinking this, could someone just clarify it for me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Two possible reasons come to mind:

1. The scatter in the data produces a best-fit line that is close to, but not through, the origin.

2. The data consists of points relatively close to each other, but far away from the origin. So a small amount of scatter in the data produces a best-fit line that is not even close to passing through the origin.

Without seeing your data, it's impossible to give a definitive answer. You haven't told us any details about the system or circuit being measured. If the bandwidth data are in the MHz range, then 288 Hz is for all practical purposes at the origin.
 
R(x) BW(y)
50 457
100 636
200 937
300 1296
400 1614
500 1938
600 2290
800 2925
1000 3630

LINEST function:
3.322306649 288.8765265
0.016948199 9.025789158
0.999817868 15.33684586
38426.63043 7
9038667.468 1646.531886

This is my data. I know that as resistance increases, bandwidth increases. I get the relationship between the two. I just don't understand that no matter what, when I graph them that it would never go through the origin. My manual says that no matter the numbers it would never be y=0, x=0. I guess I just can't understand why.
 
Last edited:
I plotted your numbers in Excel, and you're right it clearly does not go through the origin. There is very little scatter in the data and it produces a nice straight line.

I don't know anything about what you're actually measuring, but it might be that your measuring instruments contribute to the bandwidth. If so, then even when resistance=0 there will be a measureable bandwidth due to the instrumentation.

Realize that I am merely guessing, since you haven't described your experimental setup.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top