Gravitational Acceleration Help

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on proving the equivalence of GMm(1/r1 - 1/r2) and mgh near the Earth's surface, where r2 is nearly equal to r1. Participants suggest starting with the gravitational formula g = GM/r1^2 and substituting r2 = r1 + h, assuming h is much smaller than r1. They emphasize simplifying the expression by canceling mass m and manipulating the terms to relate h, r1, and r2. The conclusion drawn is that under the assumption h << r1, the two expressions can be approximated as equal, leading to the result mgh. The discussion highlights the importance of recognizing the smallness of h in the context of gravitational calculations.
wikidrox
Messages
44
Reaction score
0
I don't understand how to do this question. Please help

Show that GMm (1/r1 - 1/r2) and mgh are, for practical purposes, equal, when r2 is almost equal to r1 near the Earth's surface.

I just don't know how to do it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1.
g=\frac{GM}{r_{1}^{2}}, where r_{1} is the radius of the earth.

2. Set r_{2}=r_{1}+h, and assume h&lt;&lt;r_{1}

See if these relations might help you..
 
wikidrox said:
I don't understand how to do this question. Please help

Show that GMm (1/r1 - 1/r2) and mgh are, for practical purposes, equal, when r2 is almost equal to r1 near the Earth's surface.

I just don't know how to do it.
Okay, if you're trying to prove that:

GMm(\frac{1}{r_{1}}\ -\ \frac{1}{r_{2}})\ =\ mgh

Notice that you can start by cancelling out "m" from both sides. Also, notice that you can rewrite the stuff in brackets like so:

GM\frac{r_{2}\ -\ r_{1}}{r_{2}r_{1}}\ =\ gh

Now, can you think of a relationship between h, r1, and r2? Also, recognize that r1 is the radius of the Earth. Now, can you use the information from the previous sentence to make an assumption so that you can do something with the r1r2 part?
 
hgfdkl;

I still can get it totally.

here is where I get to:

GM/r1^2 + r1h = g

I can't get rid of the r1h.
 
Let's do this as follows:

1. You are to approximate:
GMm(\frac{1}{r_{1}}-\frac{1}{r_{1}+h})

2. You know the following:
\frac{GM}{r_{1}^{2}}=g,h&lt;&lt;r_{1}

3. Bring the difference in 1. together like this:
GMm(\frac{1}{r_{1}}-\frac{1}{r_{1}+h})=GMm(\frac{r_{1}+h-r_{1}}{r_{1}(r_{1}+h)})=
m\frac{GM}{r_{1}^{2}}\frac{h}{1+\frac{h}{r_{1}}}=\frac{mgh}{1+\frac{h}{r_{1}}}

4.
Now, by 2:
h&lt;&lt;r_{1}\to\frac{h}{r_{1}}&lt;&lt;1

The fraction in the denominator is seen to be much less than 1, and therefore we have the approximate equality:
\frac{mgh}{1+\frac{h}{r_{1}}}\approx{mgh}
 
Then there's always a series expansion :biggrin:
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top