Gravitational Machines: Ideas & Designs

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the concept of gravitational machines, with participants seeking clarification on the type of machine being referenced. Suggestions include traditional gravity-driven devices like old-style clocks and hydroelectric generators, which are recognized as reliable forms of energy. There is skepticism regarding the feasibility of anti-gravity machines, with some participants expressing doubt about the original poster's expectations for encouragement. The conversation also touches on the humorous notion of graviton emitters, indicating a playful tone among users. Overall, the thread highlights a mix of curiosity about gravity-related technology and skepticism about its practical application.
rediondragon
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Does anyone have any good ideas and designs of such a machine. I have one, but I still need to study some other things before I start experimenting on the subject.
 
Computer science news on Phys.org
Talking about gravitational machines!
 
What sort of "graviational machine" are you talking about? Something like a rocket engine...?
 
Maybe an old-style clock with the weighted drive chains?
 
Oh, yeah, that kind of gravity machine. Well I'm a big fan of hydro power.
 
That's certainly the easiest and most reliable form.
Unless, of course, he's looking for an anti-gravity machine, in which case he's in absolutely the wrong site.
 
All this guy's posts are about a gravity machine - I think he's waiting for an ecnouraging response, I think he's going to be disapointed.
 
mgb_phys said:
All this guy's posts are about a gravity machine - I think he's waiting for an ecnouraging response, I think he's going to be disapointed.

what do you don't have a graviton emitter? i have like 5
 
ice109 said:
what do you don't have a graviton emitter? i have like 5
I had one but the batteries ran out and so it fell of the earth.
 
  • #10
How about we wait until Red gets back to clarify the question? A gravity powered machine is perfectly acceptable (as in Russ' example of a hydro-electric generator or mine of a clock).
 
  • #11
Because in his other thread he claims to be building a machine to cancel and control gravity but won't tell us any details in case we steal it!
 
  • #12
Oh... I'm glad that I missed that one.
 
  • #13
Duplicate thread.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top