Gravitational potential and kinetic energy

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving gravitational potential energy and kinetic energy in the context of a car rolling around a loop in an amusement park ride. The original poster seeks to determine the minimum height from which the car must start to complete the loop without falling off.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the conservation of energy principle, questioning how gravitational potential energy converts to kinetic energy as the car moves through the loop. There is discussion about the necessary speed at the top of the loop to maintain contact with the track, leading to considerations of forces acting on the car.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered insights into the relationship between potential energy and the forces at play, particularly at the top of the loop. There is an ongoing exploration of the calculations involved, with participants questioning the correctness of derived expressions and the assumptions made regarding the forces acting on the car.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of considering both gravitational potential energy and the forces acting on the car at different points in the loop. There is an emphasis on the need for the car to maintain contact with the track, which introduces additional constraints to the problem.

moy13
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A car in an amusement park ride rolls without friction around the track shown in the figure

http://session.masteringphysics.com/problemAsset/1041727/8/YF-07-32.jpg

It starts from rest at point A at a height h above the bottom of the loop. Treat the car as a particle.

What is the minimum value of h (in terms of R) such that the car moves around the loop without falling off at the top (point B)?

Homework Equations



Ugrav1 + K1 = Ugrav2 + K2
circumference of a circle = 2*pi*R

The Attempt at a Solution



I thought that since there is no friction, energy is conserved so the energy used to roll up and down the loop is the energy transformed from gravitational potential energy to kinetic energy. So, I thought the height should be 2*pi*R to make it around the loop, but it is wrong. So, how can I decide what the minimum value of h should be?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You're right that PE becomes ½mv² but just getting the car back to h means that it has 0 speed, which isn't enough to hold it in contact with the tracks.

Hence you need mv²/r = mg at that point in order to maintain contact.

With that in mind work your PE to ½mv² magic.
 
In addition to using the conservation of energy you need to consider the forces on the car.There are two forces on the car at the top of the loop.Try sketching it out and marking in these forces.One of these forces remains constant,which one is it?What is the second force and what happens to this when the speed of the car reduces?Sorry LowlyPion you beat me to the click.I will leave this here anyway.
 
Last edited:
mv^2 / r = mg, then v^2 = rg where r = R

so I get mgh = mg(2R) + (1/2)mRg

mg cancels out and h = 2R + (1/2)R = (5/2)R

is this correct? I don't really understand.

Thanks for any help though.
 
moy13 said:
mv^2 / r = mg, then v^2 = rg where r = R

so I get mgh = mg(2R) + (1/2)mRg

mg cancels out and h = 2R + (1/2)R = (5/2)R

is this correct? I don't really understand.

Thanks for any help though.

mgh is your potential energy. You've got that.

Now at any point you will have PE and KE. (At the bottom PE is 0 and it's all KE.)

But now you have the additional constraint that the car stays on the track at the top of the loop.

At the top there is centripetal acceleration outward (up) and there is mg (down) and they need to add to 0. If centripetal acceleration is at least mg then it stays on the rail and completes the loop. Well you know then that mv²/r = mg. Or mv² = mg*R

Since then 1/2mv² is your kinetic energy and since at the top of the loop you also have the mg2R of potential energy then you have 2R + 1/2R as you found.
 
oh wow, that does make sense, thank you LowlyPion.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
13K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
55
Views
6K