Gravitational Potential Energy of a rope

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating Bruce's speed at the bottom of a swing using gravitational potential energy principles. The key equation involves the change in gravitational potential energy and kinetic energy, with the initial velocity set to zero. The participant expresses confusion over their calculations, suspecting a computational error or rounding issue, as their answer was not accepted by the homework submission site. Other users confirm that the setup appears correct and suggest reviewing calculations for mistakes. The conversation highlights the importance of careful computation in physics problems.
FailingPHYS
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
The problem states that: "Bruce stands on a bank beside a pond, grasps the end of a 10.0m long rope attached to a nearby tree and swings out to drop into the water. If the rope starts at an angle of 35 degrees with the vertical, what is Bruce's speed at the bottom of the swing?
Variables:
angle of the rope with the vertical: 35 degrees
Length of rope: 10m


I'm trying to use the equation for the change in gravitational potential energy, where the Work due to gravity = -mg(yf-yi) which is equal to Kf-Ki, and therefore -mg(yf-yi)= -1/2mvi^2+-1/2mvf^2. With the initial velocity as 0 and the masses canceling out the solution should be Vf=\sqrt{}2g(yf-yi).



I am apparently either setting up the question wrong, or going about it wrong all together. I'm pretty much stumped as to what I'm doing wrong and how to fix it. If someone could point me in the right direction I'd be ecstatic...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There is nothing wrong with your setup. Why do you think that there is?
 
I thought I was doing it right, but the website we use to submit our homework wasn't accepting the answer I got from the formula. Thanks.
 
FailingPHYS said:
I thought I was doing it right, but the website we use to submit our homework wasn't accepting the answer I got from the formula. Thanks.

You must be making a computational error. If you post your calculations, we can find your mistake.
 
That's okay. I think I know what happened. I probably rounded off to the wrong number is all. A similar thing happened in another homework assignment after I posted the question. Thankfully I caught that one before I ran out of chances to answer the question.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top