Gravitational waves adn Black holes frequency

supakorn
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
I'm reading this paper "Exact Gravitational Quasinormal Frequencies of Topological Black Holes"

...By D. Birmingham and S. Mokhtari : http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0609028v2"
and now i confusing what are meaning of gravitational quasinormal modes of Topological Black holes?.

Can i say that gravitational quasinormal modes of Topological Black holes are the frequencies of Topological Black holes?

Best regards

Supakorn
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello Supakorn

You wrote:
supakorn said:
I'm reading this paper "Exact Gravitational Quasinormal Frequencies of Topological Black Holes"
what are gravitational quasinormal modes of Topological Black holes?
Can i say that gravitational quasinormal modes of Topological Black holes are the frequencies of Topological Black holes?
Supakorn

I have downloaded the file too and will look into it. Intuitively I would say topological means here that possibly the black holes do not have perfect rotational symmetry and the Schwartschild surface perhaps not perfectly round. The word mode perhaps changing from one to another. Quasinormal; normal being right angles to another and quasi meaning almost? I definitally say that the sentence is frequencies of gravitational modes and not of TBH.
I'll look into it and you will hear from me again. At forward thanks for pointing out the article.

Janm
 
OK read the paper and found:
modes are scalar, vector or tensor. The frequencies are complex number with negative imaginary part. That is why they are called quasinormal. The mode with frequencies with the smallest imaginary part is actual. I don't know what anti de Sitter black holes are...
In the tensor mode also is spoken of massles black holes...
All the way interesting...
Janm
 
thank you so much.
 
supakorn said:
thank you so much.
Hello suprakorn. So you make no objections whatsoever if somebody speaks of massless black holes? I made my objections even when people spoke of black holes! Had to wear a special mouthpiece for that!
greetings Janm
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
From $$0 = \delta(g^{\alpha\mu}g_{\mu\nu}) = g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} + g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu}$$ we have $$g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} = -g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \,\, . $$ Multiply both sides by ##g_{\alpha\beta}## to get $$\delta g_{\beta\nu} = -g_{\alpha\beta} g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \qquad(*)$$ (This is Dirac's eq. (26.9) in "GTR".) On the other hand, the variation ##\delta g^{\alpha\mu} = \bar{g}^{\alpha\mu} - g^{\alpha\mu}## should be a tensor...

Similar threads

Back
Top