A Gravitational waves: effect of frequency on strain

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between gravitational wave frequency, energy flux, and strain. Participants express confusion about why strain would decrease with increasing frequency while keeping flux constant. It is clarified that a higher frequency source can have lower strain if it is either more massive or closer, which compensates for the difference in frequency. The example of black hole binaries illustrates how energy radiation varies with orbital period and mass, affecting strain measurements. Ultimately, the key takeaway is that strain is influenced by factors such as distance and mass, not just frequency alone.
RyuuJin
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hi guys. I am having a little trouble understanding a few relations professor mentioned at lectures, regarding gravitational waves - flux of energy and strain.

First one expresses how is the flux of energy F related to frequency of radiation f and inflicted strain h. And the second one is for strain.

Untitled.png


I can't quite understand, why would flux (or strain) decrease with frequency? Shouldn't strain get higher (e.g. inspiral of black holes)??

Thanks!
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
RyuuJin said:
Hi guys. I am having a little trouble understanding a few relations professor mentioned at lectures, regarding gravitational waves - flux of energy and strain.

First one expresses how is the flux of energy F related to frequency of radiation f and inflicted strain h. And the second one is for strain.

View attachment 200262


I can't quite understand, why would flux (or strain) decrease with frequency? Shouldn't strain get higher (e.g. inspiral of black holes)??

Thanks!
It is increasing with f. f2 is positive.

edit, I know almost nothing about gravity waves. Just looking at (f/1kHz). "f" is a frequency. "1/1kHz" makes that a dimensionless term. Your flux has to be in dimensions W/m2. A 2 kilohertz radiation frequency would be 2kHz/1kHz = 2. So a source with 2 kilohertz has 4 times the flux as a source with 1 kilohertz.
 
Last edited:
Sorry, I didn't write correctly (I am going to edit now). Actually both my questions are regarding strain. In the first equation, if you want to keep flux constant, than with higher frequency you get lower strain?? Why would that be?
 
RyuuJin said:
Hi guys. I am having a little trouble understanding a few relations professor mentioned at lectures, regarding gravitational waves - flux of energy and strain.

First one expresses how is the flux of energy F related to frequency of radiation f and inflicted strain h. And the second one is for strain.

View attachment 200262


I can't quite understand, why would flux (or strain) decrease with frequency? Shouldn't strain get higher (e.g. inspiral of black holes)??

Thanks!
EDIT: Sorry didn't write the question right: I can't quite understand, why would strain decrease with frequency (if you keep flux constant)? Shouldn't strain get higher (e.g. inspiral of black holes)??
 
RyuuJin said:
EDIT: Sorry didn't write the question right: I can't quite understand, why would strain decrease with frequency (if you keep flux constant)? Shouldn't strain get higher (e.g. inspiral of black holes)??

A 100 stellar mass black hole binary would increase energy radiation has they spiral in.
-A 2 second orbital period radiates 1/4th the energy of a 1 second orbit.
-A 400 stellar mass black hole binary with 2 second orbital period radiates the same energy as a 100 stellar mass binary with 1 second orbital period.
-A 100 stellar mass black hole binary with 2 second orbital period will have a strain measurement here that is the same as a 100 stellar mass black hole binary with 1 second orbital period which is twice as far away.

Consider a source A a source B. The flux is equal but source A has 10X frequency. So source B must be closer or more massive or some combination. So you could say "source B has higher strain because it has lower frequency". Really source B has higher strain because it is either closer or more massive.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
940
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
43
Views
5K
Back
Top