A Gravitomagnetism: Derivation, Theory & Insights - Bill

  • A
  • Thread starter Thread starter bhobba
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Literature
Messages
10,924
Reaction score
3,800
I often post a derivation of Maxwell's equations from Coulomb's Law and SR:
http://cse.secs.oakland.edu/haskell/Special Relativity and Maxwells Equations.pdf

The author has also published book about it, I sort of on a whim purchased:
https://www.amazon.com/dp/1516864743/?tag=pfamazon01-20

In it he also applied the same derivation to gravity, and not surprisingly ends up with the Gravitomagnetic equations. They are, unlike Maxwell's equations, not relativistically invariant, nor do they take into account gravity gravitates that Peter Donis wrote excellent insight articles about:
https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/does-gravity-gravitate/

It must fail because unlike electric charge mass 'charges' are not invariant as it forms part of the stress energy tensor.

My query is does anyone know any literature about the gravitomagnetic theory being some kind f limiting case of GR, like linearised gravity is?

Thanks
Bill
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
bhobba said:
They are, unlike Maxwell's equations, not relativistically invariant

Yes, that's because the source, unlike in the Maxwell case, is not a 4-vector, but a tensor.

bhobba said:
does anyone know any literature about the gravitomagnetic theory being some kind f limiting case of GR, like linearised gravity is?

Section 1.2 of this paper might be the sort of thing you are looking for:

https://arxiv.org/pdf/gr-qc/0311030.pdf
 
bhobba said:
I often post a derivation of Maxwell's equations from Coulomb's Law and SR:
http://cse.secs.oakland.edu/haskell/Special Relativity and Maxwells Equations.pdf
Hmm... Haskell appears to use a Loedel-type diagram and analysis, which works for special cases... but is limited, compared to a Minkowski diagram and its methods.

On gravitomagnetism,
this ancient thread (my post and the rest of thread) might be of interest.
https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/there-is-no-gravitational-dipole.80710/#post-691492
https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/gravitomagnetism-and-gr.54932/
 
It's not about gravitomagnetism, but as usual Feynman is a very good read to get an alternative view on fundamental physics:

R. P. Feynman, Feynman lectures on gravitation,
Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts (1996).
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
From $$0 = \delta(g^{\alpha\mu}g_{\mu\nu}) = g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} + g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu}$$ we have $$g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} = -g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \,\, . $$ Multiply both sides by ##g_{\alpha\beta}## to get $$\delta g_{\beta\nu} = -g_{\alpha\beta} g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \qquad(*)$$ (This is Dirac's eq. (26.9) in "GTR".) On the other hand, the variation ##\delta g^{\alpha\mu} = \bar{g}^{\alpha\mu} - g^{\alpha\mu}## should be a tensor...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
Back
Top