Green's function in acoustics,method of descent

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the mathematical manipulations involving compact Green's functions in 2D acoustics, particularly focusing on the differentiation of delta functions and the application of the chain rule in the context of linear functions. Participants are examining specific equations and their implications in the context of acoustics.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about the differentiation of the delta function in a mathematical manipulation, questioning whether it is differentiating with respect to the term within the brackets or with respect to t.
  • Another participant explains that if f(x) is a function and x=g(t) is a linear function of t, then the chain rule applies, leading to a relationship between the derivatives with respect to t and x.
  • A similar point is reiterated by another participant, emphasizing that the operators for differentiation have the same effect due to the linearity of the argument of the delta function.
  • One participant seeks clarification on what the primed delta function is differentiating with respect to, indicating a need for further detail.
  • A later reply addresses the confusion regarding the primed delta, clarifying that it refers to differentiating with respect to x and then substituting x with a specific expression.
  • Another participant notes that Y is a vector and suggests that a detailed analysis would require the use of Taylor's theorem with two variables, highlighting the linearity of the term involving Y.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants are engaged in clarifying mathematical concepts and expressions, but there is no consensus on the interpretation of certain aspects, particularly regarding the differentiation of the delta function and the context of the variables involved.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes assumptions about the linearity of functions and the application of the chain rule, but these assumptions are not universally agreed upon, and the implications of the delta function's differentiation remain unresolved.

davon806
Messages
147
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Hi there,
I was reading a book discussing on the topic of compact Green's function in 2D. However,I have been stuck for a while on some mathematical manipulations depicted below.
Q.jpg

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


In 2nd box,I guess the author was trying to pull out the differentiation sign and make use of the fact that the delta function is an even function.However,the delta function in the first box is differentiating with respect to the single term within the bracket rather than t?
 

Attachments

  • Q.jpg
    Q.jpg
    53.7 KB · Views: 3,709
Physics news on Phys.org
if ##f(x)## is a function and ##x=g(t)## is any linear function of t (such that ##\frac{\partial g}{\partial{t}}=c_1##) then from the chain rule it follows that ##\frac{\partial f}{\partial t}=\frac{\partial f}{\partial x}c_1##.

To state it more clearly, the operators ##\frac{\partial}{\partial t}, \frac{\partial}{\partial Y}## have the same effect (up to a constant) because the argument ##x=g(t,Y)## of the delta function is linear both in t and Y.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davon806
Delta² said:
if ##f(x)## is a function and ##x=g(t)## is any linear function of t (such that ##\frac{\partial g}{\partial{t}}=c_1##) then from the chain rule it follows that ##\frac{\partial f}{\partial t}=\frac{\partial f}{\partial x}c_1##.

To state it more clearly, the operators ##\frac{\partial}{\partial t}, \frac{\partial}{\partial Y}## have the same effect (up to a constant) because the argument ##x=g(t,Y)## of the delta function is linear both in t and Y.

For the primed delta in 2nd box, what is delta differentiating with respect to?
 
I don't see any primed delta in the 2nd box, if you mean at first box, there it is like saying ##\delta'(x)## that is differentiate w.r.t x and then replace ##x=t-\tau-...##
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davon806
I see now Y is a vector ##(y_1,y_2)## if we want to do this in detail we ll have to use taylor's theorem with two variables but again the key point is that the term ##\hat x \cdot Y=x_1y_1+x_2y_2## is linear in ##y_1 , y_2##
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K