Green's functions, F/Laplace Transforms, and Boundary conditions

quantum13
Messages
65
Reaction score
0
I'm having a ton of trouble understanding how to solve diff eqs by using Fourier or laplace transforms to solve for the green's function, with boundary conditions included. I can understand the basics of green's function solutions, especially if transforms are not needed, but my textbook seems like its spitting out voodoo magic whenever it uses transforms. I can't find many clear online resources either. Could anyone point me to some online resource that explains this and hopefully has some really basic examples, because right now I don't even know where to start.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
quantum13 said:
I'm having a ton of trouble understanding how to solve diff eqs by using Fourier or laplace transforms to solve for the green's function, with boundary conditions included. I can understand the basics of green's function solutions, especially if transforms are not needed, but my textbook seems like its spitting out voodoo magic whenever it uses transforms. I can't find many clear online resources either. Could anyone point me to some online resource that explains this and hopefully has some really basic examples, because right now I don't even know where to start.

I'm in the same boat as you. Green function methods to solve PDE is a total blackout for me. I don't even know if using a Fourier or Laplace transform can solve a PDE that involves the Laplacian operator (in 2 or 3 dimensions). So I'll be following this thread.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top