Grounding(Earthing)Resistance Calc.

  • Thread starter Thread starter dsky
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the calculations of grounding (earthing) resistance, particularly in the context of substation installations. Participants explore various formulas related to resistance, including the role of natural logarithms in these calculations, and seek clarification on specific parameters and constants used in the equations.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about the frequent appearance of natural logarithm terms in grounding resistance formulas and requests explanations in layman's terms.
  • Another participant suggests that the natural logarithm arises from the integral of dr/r, indicating a mathematical basis for its inclusion.
  • A participant asks for the equation of single rod resistance and questions whether the coefficients k and k' can be neglected in their calculations.
  • Multiple participants provide variations of the grounding resistance formulas, including Rrod and its dependence on soil resistivity, rod length, and diameter.
  • There is a query about the differences between two formulas for grounding resistance and whether certain terms can be omitted to yield lower resistance results.
  • One participant points out a potential error in the notation of a formula and emphasizes the need for accurate references to standards like IEEE 80.
  • Concerns are raised about the meaningfulness of mutual resistance calculations for a single rod setup.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying levels of understanding and confusion regarding the formulas and constants involved in grounding resistance calculations. There is no consensus on the appropriateness of omitting certain terms or the implications of specific constants.

Contextual Notes

Some formulas referenced are taken from IEEE standards, but participants note discrepancies and seek clarification on specific parameters. The discussion reflects a mix of established formulas and participant-derived interpretations, with some uncertainty about the application of constants in specific scenarios.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals involved in electrical engineering, particularly those working with grounding systems, as well as students seeking to understand grounding resistance calculations.

dsky
Dear Experts,
I'm in the mountains doing installation of a substation grounding in Thailand, after 15 years of labor suprvision on construction works and rote following of plans has really blunted my engineering/math analysis skills,forgotten most of my college elect. theories, don't have university access now so pls bear with me coz I am not planning to be a design engineer but only want to understand.
I was wondering why in most calculations does the nat.logarithm terms always appears, for example :
(1)Basic Resistance Formula : R = rho*Lenght/Area

(2)Resistance of ground rod bed R2= (rho/(2pi*N*L))*(ln(4L/a)-1+((2kL/A^0.5)*(N^0.5-1)^2

(3)Resistance of grid R1= (rho/pi*Lc)*(ln(2Lc/(b*2h)^0.5)+(k*Lc/A^0.5)-k')

(4)Mutual Resistance Rm = (rho/pi*Lc)*(ln(2Lc/L)+(k*Lc/A^0.5)-k'+1)

(5)Final ground reisitance Rg = R1*R2-Rm^2/ (R1+R2-2Rm)
whre :
rho = soil resistivity in ohm*m , linear units in meters
a = diameter of ground rod
b = diametrer of ground grid or mesh & connecting conductor
L = length of rod
Lc = total length of grid conductors
A = land area occupied by ground grid with rod
k,k' are experimental constants to be sourced from IEEE table
Lt = Lc + L
Also why is the above are different from recommended formula :
(5) Rg = (rho/4)*(pi/A)^0.5 + rho/ Lt
which is taken basically from
(6) Rg = (rho/4)*(pi/A)^0.5
Can remove the terms with "A" on formulas (2) to (4) coz the result will give me lower resistance result as compared to (5)
all formulas are taken from IEEEstd 80 except for (1), that my friend lend to me but would lessen my professional leverage if I further ask.

thanks for any expalination on this matters, laymans terms are also welcome.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
The natural log often is involved because there is an integral of dr/r for which the solution is ln r, and with limits, b -> a, one would get ln b - ln a - ln b/a.
 
dsky said:
Dear Experts,
I'm in the mountains doing installation of a substation grounding in Thailand, after 15 years of labor suprvision on construction works and rote following of plans has really blunted my engineering/math analysis skills,forgotten most of my college elect. theories, don't have university access now so pls bear with me coz I am not planning to be a design engineer but only want to understand.
I was wondering why in most calculations does the nat.logarithm terms always appears, for example :
(1)Basic Resistance Formula : R = rho*Lenght/Area

(2)Resistance of ground rod bed R2= (rho/(2pi*N*L))*(ln(4L/a)-1+((2kL/A^0.5)*(N^0.5-1)^2

(3)Resistance of grid R1= (rho/pi*Lc)*(ln(2Lc/(b*2h)^0.5)+(k*Lc/A^0.5)-k')

(4)Mutual Resistance Rm = (rho/pi*Lc)*(ln(2Lc/L)+(k*Lc/A^0.5)-k'+1)

(5)Final ground reisitance Rg = R1*R2-Rm^2/ (R1+R2-2Rm)
whre :
rho = soil resistivity in ohm*m , linear units in meters
a = diameter of ground rod
b = diametrer of ground grid or mesh & connecting conductor
L = length of rod
Lc = total length of grid conductors
A = land area occupied by ground grid with rod
k,k' are experimental constants to be sourced from IEEE table
Lt = Lc + L
Also why is the above are different from recommended formula :
(5) Rg = (rho/4)*(pi/A)^0.5 + rho/ Lt
which is taken basically from
(6) Rg = (rho/4)*(pi/A)^0.5
Can remove the terms with "A" on formulas (2) to (4) coz the result will give me lower resistance result as compared to (5)
all formulas are taken from IEEEstd 80 except for (1), that my friend lend to me but would lessen my professional leverage if I further ask.

thanks for any expalination on this matters, laymans terms are also welcome.

Hello. i want to ask you. can you help me??
1. can you give me an equation of single rod resistance of earhing??
2. i can't find coefficient of k dan k' in IEEE. in single rod, can k dan k' neglect or avoid (equal zero)?
the data of single rod on my schoolproject:
1. there is no area (A) because just one rod.
2. N = 1 , because just one rod.

thank you for answering my question.
 
Rrod=ρ/2πLr .[ln(8Lr ⁄ d)– 1]

ρ: is the resistivity of the soil in Ω•m
Lr: is the length of the ground rod in m
D: is the diameter of the ground rod in m
 
m.s.j said:
Rrod=ρ/2πLr .[ln(8Lr ⁄ d)– 1]

ρ: is the resistivity of the soil in Ω•m
Lr: is the length of the ground rod in m
D: is the diameter of the ground rod in m

wow thank you m.s.j.
1. why can the "ln(8Lr ⁄ d)" change "ln(4Lr ⁄ d)" ?
2. can you give me the equation of "Resistance of grid R1" and "Mutual Resistance Rm" of single rod?
will be Resistance of grid R1= (rho/pi*Lc)*(ln(2Lc/(b*2h)^0.5)-k') ?
wiil be Mutual Resistance Rm = (rho/pi*Lc)*(ln(2Lc/L)-k'+1) ? is it right? may the "Rm" be negative value because of the large k' ?
i m sorry. i m very confusing. thank you again.
 
1-In mentioned formula "2a" is the diameter of ground rod not "a" (please refer to IEEE 80, page 66 and BS 7430)
R2= (rho/(2pi*N*L))*(ln(4L/a)-1+((2kL/A^0.5)*(N^0.5-1)^2

2- Grounding grid and mutual resistance for single rod is meaningless.

--------------------------------
Creative thinking is breezy, Then think about your surrounding things and other thought products. http://electrical-riddles.com
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
4K