Solve Guass Jordan Problem: Step-by-Step Guide

  • Thread starter Thread starter paulchem
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a system of equations using Gaussian elimination and specifically the Gauss-Jordan method. A user expresses frustration with their calculations and seeks help after encountering an arithmetic error during row operations. Another participant identifies the mistake and suggests a clearer approach to redoing the problem, emphasizing the importance of formatting for readability. The conversation also touches on the use of LaTeX for better presentation of mathematical work. The thread concludes with encouragement to redo the problem step-by-step using the suggested formatting for clarity.
paulchem
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Use guass jordan reduction


Hi, sorry for introducing myself. I was just frustrated because I've been trying to do this problem for awhile.

4x+y-3z=11
2x-3y+2z=9
x+y+z=-3



4 1 -3 11
0 -1 0 3
0 3 7 -23

R2+2R3-->R2
4R3+-R1-->R3


3R1+-R3-->R1
4 0 2 56
0 -1 0 3
0 3 7 -23

I'm stuck here.

The calculator gave me

1 0 0 7/18
0 1 0 -3
0 0 1 -7/18

Please tell me where I went wrong thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
One thing I often do with these type of problems is that I redo the work from scratch -- I usually won't make the same mistake both times. (swapping rows around decreases the odds of remaking the mistake too)


That being said, you made an arithmetic error computing R2+2R3-->R2.
 
Last edited:
I think a good idea when you start one of these questions is to first eliminate any coefficients of x which are greater than 1. So in the case of your question, starting with the given system, I would do:

R1' = R1 - 4R3
R2' = R2 - 2R3
 
Hello PaulChem. You know, I'm not trying to be critical, really I'm not, but those numbers look a little "busy", hard to follow. I don't expect you to know now how to make some really nice math format using LaTex which you can learn all about by jumping to the Physics Forum and checking out "Introducing LaTex". But here is what it would look like with a little formatting. Just double click on it and a small window will pop up showing the LaTex commands:

<br /> \left[ <br /> \begin{array}{cccc}<br /> 4 &amp; 1 &amp; -3 &amp; 11 \\<br /> 0 &amp; -1 &amp; 0 &amp; 3 \\<br /> 0 &amp; 3 &amp; 7 &amp; -23 <br /> \end{array}<br /> \right]<br />

Edit: alright single click, whatever. I get confussed.
 
Last edited:
And if you want to draw a partitioned array...

<br /> <br /> \left(<br /> <br /> \begin{array}{ccc|c}<br /> <br /> 4 &amp; 1 &amp; -3 &amp; 11 \\<br /> <br /> 0 &amp; -1 &amp; 0 &amp; 3 \\<br /> <br /> 0 &amp; 3 &amp; 7 &amp; -23 <br /> <br /> \end{array}<br /> <br /> \right)<br /> <br />
 
Hurkyl said:
And if you want to draw a partitioned array...

<br /> <br /> \left(<br /> <br /> \begin{array}{ccc|c}<br /> <br /> 4 &amp; 1 &amp; -3 &amp; 11 \\<br /> <br /> 0 &amp; -1 &amp; 0 &amp; 3 \\<br /> <br /> 0 &amp; 3 &amp; 7 &amp; -23 <br /> <br /> \end{array}<br /> <br /> \right)<br /> <br />

Oh that is so much nicer. Mine is crummy.

Edit: Yep, PaulChem, I say do the whole problem again using Hurkly's format, step by step, nice "partitioned arrays", cut and past his commands into your post. With a final line saying: x, y, and z are: :smile:
 
Last edited:
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top