Guass Law involving conducting cylinders

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on applying Gauss's law to find the electric field at a specific point between two coaxial cylindrical conductors. The inner cylinder has a positive charge, while the outer cylinder carries a negative charge, creating a complex electric field scenario. Participants clarify that using the total enclosed charge or linear charge density both yield correct results due to the cylindrical symmetry of the system. It is emphasized that the length of the conductors does not affect the final answer when using Gauss's law. Understanding the charge distribution and symmetry is crucial for solving such problems accurately.
maiad
Messages
101
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Two coaxial cylindrical conductors are shown in perspective and cross-section above. The inner cylinder has radius a = 2.0 cm, length L = 10.0 m and carries a total charge of Qinner = + 8.0 nC (1 nC = 10-9 C). The outer cylinder has an inner radius b = 6.0 cm, outer radius c = 7.0 cm, length L = 10.0 m and carries a total charge of Qouter = - 16.0 nC (1 nC = 10-9 C). What is Ex, the x-component of the electric field at point P which is located at the midpoint of the length of the cylinders at a distance r = 4.0 cm from the origin and makes an angle of 30.0o with the x-axis?

https://www.smartphysics.com/Content/Media/Images/EM/IE/cylinderx/coaxial.gif

Homework Equations


E A= q(enclosed)/\epsilon


The Attempt at a Solution



I simply treated the enclosed charge as +8nC, but I've seen ppl using linear charge density and yet they still got the answer. Is just just fluke luck that i got the answer? This is an online hmwk grading system btw.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
maiad said:
I simply treated the enclosed charge as +8nC, but I've seen ppl using linear charge density and yet they still got the answer. Is just just fluke luck that i got the answer?
No, it's not a fluke. You are to assume that this section of length L is just a piece out of a much longer cable (or you are looking only at the field near the center of the piece). The field is cylindrically symmetric, so the length you choose to analyze doesn't matter.

Regardless of how you choose to solve it, if you use Gauss's law you'll need the charge enclosed in whatever Gaussian surface you use. That charge can be thought of as λL, where λ is the linear charge density. Note that L drops out of your final answer.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top