Guass's Law for a charge distribution

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
4 replies · 2K views
Demon117
Messages
162
Reaction score
1
First, this is not a homework question, just something I've been confused about for some time. I understand how to use Gauss's law in many ways but one thing I have always stumbled with is whether the E-field of a charge distribution should involve little r or big R in such an example:

In finding the E-field of a long cylindrical charge distribution with radius R and a uniform charge density [itex]\rho[/itex]. If I want to find the E-field inside (r<R) such a distribution shouldn't the final answer contain a big R?

Here is my work. Since we have cylindrical symmetry we can consider a guassian cylinder of radius r inside about the cylindrical axis. The total charge Q is given by [itex]Q=\rho V[/itex] where V is the volume of the entire cylinder correct? (This is where I get confused) Or just the Guassian cylinder?

If the entire cylinder then the volume is [itex]V=\pi R^{2}L[/itex], where L is the length of the cylindrical volume. Then working out the rest of the problem we have:

[itex]\oint EdA=E(2\pi r)L = \frac{Q}{\epsilon_{0}} = \frac{\rho \pi R^{2}L}{\epsilon_{0}}[/itex]
[itex]E = \frac{\rho R^2}{2 \epsilon_{0} r}[/itex]

If the Guassian cylinder then the volume is [itex]V=\pi r^{2}L[/itex], then the E-field is just:

[itex]E = \frac{\rho r}{2 \epsilon_{0}}[/itex]

Do you see my confusion? I need to understand this and I think it is just geometrical issue. . .
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You need to be aware of a very important aspect of Gauss's Law - that the field at any point r depends ONLY on the charges enclosed by the surface of size r (under highly symmetric situation). The charges outside the surface do not contribute to the E-field.

So in your example, you could have R = infinity if you wish, and you still have the same expression for the E-field, because it only cares about the amount of charges enclosed by your gaussian surface.

Zz.
 
If you're confident you've done it right, you have to believe the results which you get!
 
Last edited:
According to the Gauss's Law, Q is the charge inside the gaussian surface. So, the 2nd answer involving 'r' is right.