B Gyro stabilized two-wheeled toy : Why the gimbal?

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter Swamp Thing
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gyro
AI Thread Summary
Removing the gimbal from a gyro-stabilized two-wheeled toy compromises its stability, as the gyroscope's ability to resist tilt is diminished. Without the gimbal, any tilt creates a force that opposes the gyroscope's natural tendency to stabilize, leading to instability. Experiments demonstrate that when a gyro is fixed in place, it loses its resistance to tilting, behaving as if it were not spinning. The discussion highlights the importance of maintaining the gimbal for effective stabilization, as constraints on the gyro's movement can lead to tipping. Understanding the dynamics of angular momentum is crucial for grasping how the system operates.
Swamp Thing
Insights Author
Messages
1,032
Reaction score
770
Will this toy stay upright if we get rid of the gimbal and fix the gyro's rotation axis w.r.t. the chassis?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The way they have it, any tendency to tilt is resisted by the gyroscope, which freely rotates on the gimble. If you remove the gimble, a tendency of the board to tilt sideways creates a desire for the gyro to tilt forward or backward. That is then resisted by the fixed platform that the gyro is on and the resistance force makes the gyro want to tilt sideways. So the gyroscopic stabilization is defeated.

A simple experiment shows what happens. If you hold a gyro in your hands and try to tilt it, you feel the resistance to that tilt (initial tilt) and a desire of the gyro to tilt in another direction (secondary tilt). But if you brace the gyro so that it's desire for the secondary tilt is stopped, you will not feel any unusual resistance to your initial tilting. It would feel as though the gyro is not spinning at all.
 
Last edited:
FactChecker said:
But if you brace the gyro so that it's desire for the secondary tilt is stopped, you will not feel any unusual resistance to your initial tilting. It would feel as though the gyro is not spinning at all.

I'm finding it hard to visualize that, and I don't remember noticing it when I last played with a bicycle wheel gyro (which was a long time ago, admittedly).

I'll think about it a bit more and get back.

Thanks.
 
I'm beginning to get it -- I think -- based on adding the vector angular momentum that the new constraint would try to produce, on top of the original angular momentum of the spinning gyro. When we add the extra constraining torque, the resultant shows that the whole thing would tend to tip over.
 
  • Like
Likes FactChecker and scottdave
This may help. Especially the demo at 3:09
 
  • Like
Likes Swamp Thing and scottdave
Swamp Thing said:
I'm beginning to get it -- I think -- based on adding the vector angular momentum that the new constraint would try to produce, on top of the original angular momentum of the spinning gyro. When we add the extra constraining torque, the resultant shows that the whole thing would tend to tip over.
Yes. I have a gyro where the gimbal can be braced against a table to prevent any lateral turning. When I push it forward, the desire to rotate laterally is exactly opposed by a force from the table. It feels like it is not a rotating gyro at all -- just rotating forward with no unusual opposition.
 
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks
Back
Top