Hamilton Jacobi equation for time dependent potential

DanielA
Messages
27
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


Suppose the potential in a problem of one degree of freedom is linearly dependent upon time such that
$$H = \frac{p^2}{2m} - mAtx $$ where A is a constant. Solve the dynamical problem by means of Hamilton's principal function under the initial conditions t = 0, x = 0, ##p = mv_0##

Homework Equations


Hamilton's Principal function is of from S(x, P, t) or ##S(x,\alpha,t)## where alpha is a constant of motion.

Hamilton Jacobi equation:
$$\frac{1}{2m}\frac{\partial S}{\partial x}^2 - mAtx + \frac{\partial S}{\partial t} = 0$$

The Attempt at a Solution


In class today my professor admitted he just trial and errored to find S. I've been trying to do it, but I can't find any working solution. I recognize S will be some polynomial in form, with multiple mixed terms, but the squared term messed up any simpler solution I've tried. I've only attempted to get a similar functional form and iterate it and mess with constants out front to get it exact.
I've tried quadratic forms like ##(x-t)^2## and similar with the goal of crossing out the ##x^2 ## and ##t^2## terms to leave only the cross terms. I briefly considered attempting a Fourier Transform style solution like we were learning in Math Methods before realizing it wouldn't work.

I found a solution on Stack Exchange, but they use the solution obtained by hamilton's equations to obtain the principal function which just defeats the purpose it doing this. I know hamilton jacobi theory heavily favors time independent hamiltonians, but doing the above just makes me think that the whole question was pointless. https://physics.stackexchange.com/q...cobi-equation-with-time-dependent-hamiltonian

I'm just trying to find a method that can deal with the square or maybe a discussion on how to make educated guesses on a solution. All my searching of my textbooks and google have only given me solutions to linear partial differential equations which this one isn't because of the squared term.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is probably not going to be too satisfying. But, if you can motivate the ansatz ##S(x,t) = xf(t) + g(t)##, then it is not hard to determine functions ##f(t)## and ##g(t)## that will work.

Note that with this ansatz, ##\frac {\partial S}{\partial t} = x f'(t) + g'(t)##

##f'(t)## can then be chosen so that the ##xf'(t)## term cancels the middle term of the Hamilton-Jacobi equation. Also, ##\frac {\partial S}{\partial x} = f(t)## and will therefore be a function of ##t## alone. So, the ##g'(t)## term in ##\frac {\partial S}{\partial t} ## can be chosen to cancel the first term in the H-J equation.

Hopefully, someone else can provide a better approach.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top