Hanging Sign Equations: Finding Tension and Force Exerted by Beam

  • Thread starter Thread starter Olivia Carey
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Forces Sign
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving equations for tension and force exerted by a beam in a hanging sign scenario. The user initially calculated the tension (Ft) as 899.6 and the force exerted by the beam (F) as 422.7. However, it was pointed out that the calculated force could not be less than the vertical component of tension (Fty), indicating an error. Upon reevaluating the calculations with the correct value for Ft, the user found the correct tension to be 736.9. This highlights the importance of double-checking values in physics problems.
Olivia Carey
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
upload_2015-11-18_3-27-35.png


Equations I used:
Fty = Ft(sinθ)
Ftx = Ft(cosθ)

My attempt:

I drew a free body diagram that looked like this (the red are just components of the tension, I know they wouldn't usually be included on a free body).
upload_2015-11-18_3-33-20.png


Finding Magnitude of Tension:
Fg = 516 (I gathered from the problem)
Fg = Fty
Fty = 516
Fty = Ft(sinθ)
516 = Ft (sin35)
Ft = 899.6

Finding Magnitude of Force Exerted By Beam:
Ftx = F
Ftx = Ft(cosθ)
F = Ft(cosθ)
F = 516 (cos35)
F = 422.7

I don't know where I went wrong, but I could really use some help figuring it out! Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Olivia Carey said:
View attachment 92005
Finding Magnitude of Force Exerted By Beam:
Ftx = F
Ftx = Ft(cosθ)
F = Ft(cosθ)
F = 516 (cos35)
F = 422.7

Are you aware that you can see, that your answer can't be correct as F < Fty? By just comparing the lengths of the vectors it is obvious, that there must be a mistake.

Regarding the mistake: Your formulas are correct, you just plugged in a wrong value for Ft.
 
  • Like
Likes Olivia Carey
stockzahn said:
Are you aware that you can see, that your answer can't be correct as F < Fty? By just comparing the lengths of the vectors it is obvious, that there must be a mistake.

Regarding the mistake: Your formulas are correct, you just plugged in a wrong value for Ft.

Thank you so much! I have no idea how I didn't catch that, but I guess that's why having a fresh pair of eyes always helps! I plugged in the correct value for Ft and got 736.9, which was correct.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top