Hardest content to learn for AP Physics C: Electricity & Magnetism

AI Thread Summary
In preparing for the AP E&M exam, students often find several concepts particularly challenging. The transition from mechanics to electromagnetism can be difficult due to the loss of intuitive understanding; for instance, while students can easily grasp distances in meters, they struggle with concepts like voltage. Key mathematical challenges include the use of vectors and vector fields, as well as solving differential equations related to RC, RL, and RLC circuits. Many students also have trouble recognizing symmetry in problems, which can simplify solutions significantly. Furthermore, the three-dimensional nature of magnetism, involving cross products, poses visualization challenges. Overall, students must adapt to thinking in three dimensions and applying symmetry arguments, which are crucial for success in this calculus-based course.
cellist542
Messages
19
Reaction score
3
What are some of the hardest concepts to learn in AP E&M? I am going to prepare for the exam with my previous physics teacher. I am currently a senior enrolled in AP Calc BC, and I already took AP Mechanics.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
cellist542 said:
What are some of the hardest concepts to learn in AP E&M? I am going to prepare for the exam with my previous physics teacher. I am currently a senior enrolled in AP Calc BC, and I already took AP Mechanics.
So this is calculus-based Advanced Placement E&M at the advanced high school level? Do you have a syllabus of the course that you could post? I can think of some at the lower-division university level, but I'm not sure they are appropriate for an AP high school course...
 
There are a couple of different possibilities.

With E&M, you tend to lose the intuition you could rely on with mechanics. You probably have a good feeling for what 10 meters is, but what is exactly is 10 V? Resistance kind of makes sense, but what are capacitance and inductance?

Mathematics. (1) Vectors will make their appearance again. (2) Not only do vectors appear but the concept of vector fields does as well. (3) Applying the ideas of vector calculus to problems throws many students. (4) RC, RL, and RLC circuits are described by differential equations, which some find confusing. For many students, they're essentially learning physics and the necessary mathematics concurrently.

Recognizing and taking advantages of symmetry seems to be a problem for some students. The problems are much simpler if you use symmetry, but you can't do that unless you see it's there.

Seeing the big picture. It's easy to get lost in a zoo of formulas in intro E&M. If you see how everything is related, though, it can bring order to the apparent chaos. A lot of students, however, aren't terribly interested in learning where a formula comes from.

Magnetism is inherently three-dimensional because it involves cross products. Some people struggle with visualizing situations in three dimensions.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes hutchphd, PeroK, cellist542 and 1 other person
berkeman said:
So this is calculus-based Advanced Placement E&M at the advanced high school level? Do you have a syllabus of the course that you could post? I can think of some at the lower-division university level, but I'm not sure they are appropriate for an AP high school course...
It is a calculus-based course, and I have taken AP Calc AB.

The course has five units:
  • electrostatics
  • conductors, capacitors, dielectrics
  • electric circuits
  • magnetic fields
  • electromagnetism
This is the official course description pdf. Page 18 is a little more specific as to what each unit includes.
 
I think E&M is the first course in physics in high school one has to think seriously in 3-dimensional space with vectors. This is the main barrier which cause confusions. Before that, most students are used to be able to "draw" the solution on a 2-d plane (in fact, most high school mechanics problems are 1-d). But AP physics C E&M one has to get used to do symmetry arguments, right hand rules etc... These things are actually very much closer to how physics is done at an undergraduate level.
 
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...

Similar threads

Replies
32
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
43
Views
7K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Back
Top