Harmonic Oscillator Problem: Energy Levels & Ground State

Metallichem
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Problem:
Consider a harmonic oscillator of mass m undergoing harmonic motion in two dimensions x and y. The potential energy is given by
V(x,y) = (1/2)kxx2 + (1/2)kyy2.
(a) Write down the expression for the Hamiltonian operator for such a system.
(b) What is the general expression for the allowable energy levels of the two-dimensional harmonic oscillator?
(c) What is the energy of the ground state (the lowest energy state)?

Hint: The Hamiltonian operator can be written as a sum of operators.

Now I'm a bit lost on how to write the expression for the Hamiltonian.
Is the Hamiltonian simply H = - h2/2m d2/dx2 + V(x,y) [where V(x,y) is given above]?
Then with that Hamiltonian, solving the Schrodinger eqn is pretty straightforward to get H*psi = E*psi, now I'm a bit lost here as well to solve for the general expression for the allowable energy levels?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Metallichem said:
Problem:
Consider a harmonic oscillator of mass m undergoing harmonic motion in two dimensions x and y. The potential energy is given by
V(x,y) = (1/2)kxx2 + (1/2)kyy2.
(a) Write down the expression for the Hamiltonian operator for such a system.
(b) What is the general expression for the allowable energy levels of the two-dimensional harmonic oscillator?
(c) What is the energy of the ground state (the lowest energy state)?

Hint: The Hamiltonian operator can be written as a sum of operators.

Now I'm a bit lost on how to write the expression for the Hamiltonian.
Is the Hamiltonian simply H = - h2/2m d2/dx2 + V(x,y) [where V(x,y) is given above]?
Almost. You need to include a term for the kinetic energy due to movement in the y-direction.

Then with that Hamiltonian, solving the Schrodinger eqn is pretty straightforward to get H*psi = E*psi, now I'm a bit lost here as well to solve for the general expression for the allowable energy levels?
Have you solved the one-dimensional harmonic oscillator already?
 
I can represent the Hamiltonian as a sum of operators like this?
\hat{H} = \hat{H_x} + \hat{H_y}
 
Yes, depending on what you mean by Hx and Hy.
 
I get this, this is the general expresion of Hamiltonian Operator for the Quantum Harmonic Oscillator ??

[-ħ/2m (d^2 Ψ_x)/(dx^2 )+1/2 k_x x^2 Ψ_x ]+[-ħ/2m (d^2 Ψ_y)/(dy^2 )+1/2 k_y y^2 Ψ_y ]= EΨ_x Ψ_y
 
Part (a) is simply asking you for the operator ##\hat{H}##. The wave function doesn't appear in that expression. You wrote in your first post
$$\hat{H} = -\frac{\hbar^2}{2m} \frac{d^2}{dx^2} + V(x,y)$$ which isn't correct, but it's essentially the type of answer you want to give for (a). You just need to correct it, which I think you know how to do.

The Schrodinger equation says what happens when you apply that operator to a wave function:
$$\hat{H}\psi(x,y) = \hat{H}_x \psi(x,y) + \hat{H}_y \psi(x,y) = E \psi(x,y)$$ Note that the two pieces act on the same function. If you assume the solution has the form ##\psi(x,y) = \psi_x(x)\psi_y(y)##, you'll get something similar to what you have. Your expression isn't quite correct. You're getting there though.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top