Harmonic Oscillator & Schrodinger

bluestar
Messages
80
Reaction score
0
I wish to graph a couple of the waveforms of a harmonic oscillator. I have consulted several resources and have found two that I like but the final equation differs even though they are both labeled normalized harmonic oscillator wavefunction.

The first reference explains how the harmonic oscillator function is determined and the harmonic equation is at the very bottom of this 3 page document.
http://physchem.ox.ac.uk/~hill/tutorials/qm2_tutorial/sho_series.pdf

The second reference only presents the harmonic equation after a very brief discussion and it too is at the bottom of a 1 page display.
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/quantum/hosc2.html#c1

The difference is the first term after the equate which is: (alpha/pi)^1/4.
This term does not appear in the first reference but does appear in the second.

Also the constants just before the Hermite function differ.


Does anybody know why there is a difference between these two equations and how the difference occured?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Their definitions of y are slightly different, this is where you are getting confused.
 
It would appear the definitions of y are the same; however, omega differs.

Reference 1 defines y as

y = sqrt(m*omega/hbar)*x where omega = sqrt(k/m)
This is at equation (2)

The reference 2 defines y as:

y = sqrt(alpha)*x where alpha = (m*omega)/hbar and omega = sqrt(k/m) OR omega = 2pi
This definition occurs just above the harmonic equation at the bottom of the page and omega definition at the top of the page.

I can not tell which definition for omega was used. I suspect that since pi occurs in the final form that omega was defined as 2pi * (frequency?).

Thus are the two omegas equal? Gut feeling thinks not.
sqrt(k/m) = 2*pi*(frequency?)
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
According to recent podcast between Jacob Barandes and Sean Carroll, Barandes claims that putting a sensitive qubit near one of the slits of a double slit interference experiment is sufficient to break the interference pattern. Here are his words from the official transcript: Is that true? Caveats I see: The qubit is a quantum object, so if the particle was in a superposition of up and down, the qubit can be in a superposition too. Measuring the qubit in an orthogonal direction might...
Back
Top