1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Harmonic Oscillator

  1. Apr 14, 2007 #1
    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
    Show taht neither [itex] \Delta x [/itex] nor [itex] \Delta p [/itex] is generally constant (independant of time) for a general state of the one dimensional harmonic oscillator. Prove that [itex] (\Delta x)^2 [/itex] and [itex] (\Delta p)^2 [/itex] are both of the form

    [tex] (\Delta)^2 = A + B \cos^2 \omega t [/tex]
    where omega is the frequency associated with the oscillator.

    2. The attempt at a solution

    First of all im not really sure wht the Delta means. Does it mean Delta x should have that form??

    something like

    [tex] (\Delta x)^2 = A + B \cos^2 \omega t[/tex]
    where A and B are some constants??

    this is where i think is a logical beginning to th solution

    since we are talking about the genferla case of the harmonic oscillator then the wavefunction must be written as a superposition of states??

    [tex] \Psi(x,t) = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} c_{n} \psi_{n}(x) e^{-iE_{n}t/\hbar} [/tex]

    so we can calculate the expectation value of x
    [tex] \left<x(t)\right> =\int_{\infty}^{\infty} \Psi(x,t)^* x \Psi(x,t) dx [/tex]

    and [tex] \left<(x(t))^2\right> =\int_{\infty}^{\infty} \Psi(x,t)^* x^2 \Psi(x,t) dx [/tex]

    we're going to get cross terms like

    [tex] \left<x\right> = \int \psi_{m}^* x \psi_{n} dx [/tex]
    [tex] \left<x^2\right> =\int c_{m}^* c_{n} x_{m,n} \exp\left(\frac{iE_{m,n} t}{\hbar}\right) [/tex]

    now im just wondering how to evalue these integrals

    thanks for any help!!
    Last edited: Apr 14, 2007
  2. jcsd
  3. Apr 14, 2007 #2

    Tom Mattson

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    [tex]\Delta x = \sqrt{|<x>^2-<x^2>|}[/tex]

    I put the absolute value bars in there because I forget the actual order of subtraction. :redface:

    Do you know what the wavefunctions look like? The spatial part of the Harmonic oscillator wavefunctions are Hermite polynomials, modulated by a Gaussian exponential function. Does that help?
  4. Apr 14, 2007 #3
    hmmm we never actually went into determining these in class so im just wondering

    its not in the textbook either

    but i can acquire the formula for the hermite polynomials and get an answer from there i think
  5. Apr 14, 2007 #4


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    The question does not quite make sense to me. If you take a really general state, you won't get an expression lik ethey give but rather a sum of several cosine terms all with different values of angular frequency so I am confused by that question.

    This siad, what you should do is NOT carry out the integrations but give them a name "A" or "B" and so on. All you need to know is that those are real parameters. You will find that some of those constants will multiply complex exponentials but the complex exponentials will come in pairs which wil be complex conjugate of each other. Using [itex] e^{i \theta} + e ^{-i \theta} = 2 cos (\theta) [/itex] you will end up with a bunch of cosine of [itex] \omega t [/itex]. But again, to get only one cos in your final answer, you woul dneed to consider a superposition of only two states of different energies, not more than that.
  6. Apr 14, 2007 #5
    There are analytic expressions for the matrix elements <m|x|n> and
    <m|x^2|n> for the H.O.

    In fact the elements <m|x|n> come up in the Fermi's golden rule treatment of infrared radiation causing transitions from state |m> to state |n>.

    For anyone who's interested

  7. Apr 15, 2007 #6


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    Of course!:rolleyes: For some reason I thought this was about the infinite square well.

    So indeed, using raising and lowering operators, One may find the expectation values of x and x^2 in an arbitrary state. The x will connect two states differing by one in the quantum number "n". The x^2 will connect two states of same n or differing by two. One can write the final result in terms of the harmonic oscillator omega.
    Sorry for my mistake :frown:
  8. Apr 15, 2007 #7
    There were two posts yesterday on QM wells. The other was asking for help on the infinite square well- hence the confusion. For some reason- I mixed them up in my mind too at first.
  9. Apr 16, 2007 #8
    hmm i have seen the solution of the expectation value of x and x^2 using the ladder operators but we havent covered that in class... and we wont in this course

    but i will learn about this during the summer :smile:
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?

Similar Discussions: Harmonic Oscillator
  1. Harmonic Oscillator (Replies: 12)

  2. Harmonic Oscillator (Replies: 3)

  3. Harmonic Oscillator (Replies: 3)

  4. Harmonic Oscillators (Replies: 3)

  5. Harmonic oscillator (Replies: 1)