Harmonic osilator energy using derivatives

dawozel
Messages
17
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Show that the energy of a simple harmonic oscillator in the n = 2 state is 5Planck constantω/2 by substituting the wave function ψ2 = A(2αx2- 1)e-αx2/2 directly into the Schroedinger equation, as
broken down in the following steps.

First, calculate dψ2/dx, using A for A, x for x, and a for α.

Second, calculate d2ψ2/dx2.

The Attempt at a Solution


so I got the first derivative correct, it was

A((4*a*x)*exp((-a*x^2)/2) +(2*a*x^2 -1)*(-a*x*exp((-a*x^2)/2)))but i can seem to calculate the second derivative correctly I'm getting
A((4a)(exp(( - ax^2 ) / 2)) + (4ax) * ( - ax * exp(( - ax^2) /2)) + (4ax) * ( - a xexp(( - ax^2 ) / 2)) + (2ax - 1) (a^2x^2 *exp(( - ax^2 ) / 2)))

but this incorrect, am I missing something?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
$$\psi_2(x)=A(2\alpha x^2-1)e^{-\frac{1}{2}\alpha x^2}$$
A((4*a*x)*exp((-a*x^2)/2) +(2*a*x^2 -1)*(-a*x*exp((-a*x^2)/2)))
$$\frac{d}{dx}\psi_2(x)=A\left[4\alpha x e^{-\frac{1}{2}\alpha x^2} - (2\alpha x^2 - 1)\alpha x e^{-\frac{1}{2}\alpha x^2}\right]$$... is pretty messy so it will be easier to make mistakes: simplify this expression first. Then try the second derivative.

You can bring an ##\alpha x \exp(-\frac{1}{2}\alpha x^2)## outside the brackets ... then deal with the terms inside the brackets.

After that I suspect it is something you can do.

note: use the "quote" button below this post to see how I got the equations to typeset like that ;)
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top