Having difficulty in understanding vertical circular motion?

AI Thread Summary
Understanding vertical circular motion (VCM) requires a solid grasp of the underlying concepts, particularly the physics of forces and energy at different points in the motion. Mastery involves not only solving numerical problems but also comprehending the principles that govern motion throughout the entire circular path. It is essential to first understand horizontal circular motion and the implications of key formulas like F = v²/r. Engaging deeply with the mathematical aspects of VCM will enhance conceptual clarity. A comprehensive approach to both the theoretical and practical elements is necessary for mastering this topic.
Vivan Vatsa
Messages
16
Reaction score
1
I am having trouble understanding the concepts of vertical circular motion , though I solve all the numericals , but I think I am lacking the basic concepts of VCM.
Explain how I can master this topic?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
At what level do you want to "master" it?
Do you want a way to describe the motion all the way round? Do you want to consider the Energy at the top and the bottom? What?
 
Vivan Vatsa said:
I am having trouble understanding the concepts of vertical circular motion , though I solve all the numericals , but I think I am lacking the basic concepts of VCM.
Explain how I can master this topic?

What exactly are you having trouble with?
 
I am basically having trouble in understanding most of the conceptual questions.!
 
Vivan Vatsa said:
I am basically having trouble in understanding most of the conceptual questions.!
You would need to be a bit more detailed if you want any joy on this thread.
Circular motion in a horizontal plane needs to be understood first. Do you recognise the formula F = v2/r means and appreciate what it implies? You have to get involved in the Maths of this is you want anything but the most basic appreciation of circular motion.
 
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'

Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'

Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
View full post »

Thread 'Newton's first law?'

Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
View full post »

Similar threads

B Resultant force in vertical circular motion
Replies
6
Views
3K
Constant Circular Motion Not Really Constant
Replies
20
Views
2K
Vertical circular motion with a changing radius
Replies
2
Views
1K
B Confusion while trying to build intuition of centripetal force
Replies
15
Views
3K
Vertical circular motion
Replies
8
Views
2K
When Does an Object Experience Only Centripetal Acceleration in Circular Motion?
Replies
2
Views
1K
Can a Stone Remain in Circular Motion if Tension Equals Zero Before Velocity?
Replies
12
Views
3K
Uniform circular motion - origin of speed
Replies
4
Views
1K
What is knowing the Tension Force good for?
Replies
3
Views
9K
Confused in diffferent forces involved in circular motion
Replies
7
Views
7K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top