Having trouble with complex quadratic equations

Jeff Cook
Messages
41
Reaction score
0
All,

I am not sure how to handle this situation with complex numbers. Can you help?

Q = A^2 + ABi

Where Q is a complex number.

Can we not solve for A if we know Q and Bi using a quadratic equation?

0 = A^2 + ABi + -Q

Let...

Q = 455
Bi = -22

And in this case I do know that A = 35. However...

When,

a = 1
b = -22
c = -455

Solving...

A = ( -1 +/- Sqrt { 1 - ( 4 * -22 * -455 )}) / 2

I do not get A = 35. Any idea why and what I may be doing wrong?

Thanks,

Jeff
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You messed up while substituting values into the quadratic formula.
 
Show...

Hurky,

Could you show me what you mean? Where did I mess up?

J
 
You have confused what the problem is. You are using A in place of X, then you turn around and act like it is something else.
 
Jeff Cook said:
Hurky,

Could you show me what you mean? Where did I mess up?

J
There are 5 places in the quadratic formula where you need to substitute a number. You got three of them wrong. You know the quadratic formula, right? The solutions to

ax² + bx + c = 0

are

\frac{-b \pm \sqrt{b^2 - 4ac}}{2a},

right? Just double check your work!


robert Ihnot said:
You have confused what the problem is. You are using A in place of X, then you turn around and act like it is something else.
I'm quite sure he did not make that mistake.
 
Oops...

Hurky,

Okay, I was placing a in place of b in the quadratic equation. Stupid mistake. Thanks greatly. Now I get the correct answer.

Jeff
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top